Usage Score
1.5
Player Dossier
2014-2018Michigan
Lawrence Marshall
DL • 6'4" • 285 lbs • Southfield, MI, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Lawrence Marshall shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 6.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
6.9
Consistency
7.4
Season Value
9.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Michigan
141516171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Lawrence Marshall, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Michigan. Lawrence Marshall shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 6.9 disruption score.
Lawrence Marshall played DL for Michigan. Across 5 tracked seasons, Lawrence Marshall recorded 21 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Michigan.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Michigan paired 0 primary output with 6.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 6.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Michigan
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
0.2
Efficiency
6.9
Usage
1.5
Consistency
7.4
Best Game by takeover score
Florida
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida: 1. Notre Dame: 0. Nebraska: 1. Northwestern: 0. Maryland: 0. Wisconsin: 0. Michigan State: 0. Rutgers: 0. Indiana: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 2 by 18.3. Notre Dame: 1 by 4.2. Nebraska: 1 by 14.2. Northwestern: 1 by 4.2. Maryland: 2 by 8.3. Wisconsin: 1 by 4.2. Michigan State: 1 by 4.2. Indiana: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.1 · Games = 7 · -0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 2 · +0.4 vs Wins
First Half0.4 · Games = 5 · +0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · Games = 4 · -0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Florida
Best efficiency game
18.3 vs Florida
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/29 | vs Florida | L 15-41 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Indiana | W 31-20 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Rutgers | W 42-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Michigan State | W 21-7 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Wisconsin | W 38-13 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Maryland | W 42-21 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Northwestern | W 20-17 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Nebraska | W 56-10 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Notre Dame | L 17-24 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | 6.9 | 1.2 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | 4.2 | 0.8 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Michigan | 2 | 6.9 | 1.5 | 2 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan | 2 | 6.9 | 1.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 41.4 takeover score.
#2
Nebraska
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 38.4 takeover score.
#3
Maryland
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.4 takeover score.
#4
Cincinnati
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.3 takeover score.
#5
Maryland
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Michigan
0 primary output · 6.9 efficiency · 1.2 usage
36
#2
2017 Regular Season · Michigan
35
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.8 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Michigan
9.5
2 primary · 6.9 efficiency · 1.5 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.927
Southfield · Southfield, MI
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
21
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.