Usage Score
14.1
Player Dossier
2014-2018Michigan
Maurice Ways
WR • 6'3" • 215 lbs • Beverly Hills, MI, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Maurice Ways reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
73.6
Consistency
48.2
Season Value
59
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · California
141516171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Michigan • California
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UNLV
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Maurice Ways, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · California. Maurice Ways reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
California paired 383 primary output with 73.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 73.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, California.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · California
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
31.9
Efficiency
73.6
Usage
14.1
Consistency
48.2
Best Game by takeover score
TCU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. TCU: 37. North Carolina: 23. Unknown: 22. Oregon: 18. Arizona: 97. UCLA: 12. Oregon State: 14. Washington: 25. Washington State: 46. USC: 7. Colorado: 43. Stanford: 39
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. TCU: 3 by 82.2. North Carolina: 1 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 48.9. Oregon: 2 by 60. Arizona: 8 by 80.8. UCLA: 2 by 40. Oregon State: 1 by 93.3. Washington: 2 by 83.3. Washington State: 3 by 100. USC: 1 by 46.7. Colorado: 3 by 95.6. Stanford: 5 by 52
Split Comparison
Wins22.4 · n=5 · -19.1 vs Losses
Losses41.5 · n=6 · +19.1 vs Wins
First Half34.8 · n=6 · +5.8 vs Second Half
Second Half29 · n=6 · -5.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona
Best efficiency game
100 vs Washington State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/27 | @ TCU | L 7-10 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 12/1 | vs Stanford | L 13-23 | — | 5 | 39 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 11/25 | vs Colorado | W 33-21 | — | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 1 | 30 |
| Sun 11/11 | @ USC | W 15-14 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 11/4 | @ Washington State | L 13-19 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Washington | W 12-10 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Oregon State | W 49-7 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs UCLA | L 7-30 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 10/7 | @ ArizonaHigh volume | L 17-24 | — | 8 | 97 | 12.1 | 12.10 | 0 | 41 |
| Sun 9/30 | vs Oregon | L 24-42 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs North Carolina | W 24-17 | — | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 23 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2014-2017
Opening stop
- 2
California
2018
Final stop
Season Progression
201420152016201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan | 40 | 75.6 | 5.7 | 40 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan | 24 | 56.7 | 5.5 | -16 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan | 7 | 15.6 | 7.9 | -17 |
| 2018 Postseason | California | 383 | 73.6 | 14.1 | 376 |
| 2018 Regular Season | California | 383 | 73.6 | 14.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UNLV
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
21
Primary metric
21 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Hawai'i
22
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arizona
97
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 80.8 efficiency score.
#4
Washington State
46
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Colorado
43
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · California
383 primary output · 73.6 efficiency · 14.1 usage
59
#2
2018 Regular Season · California
59
383 primary · 73.6 efficiency · 14.1 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Michigan
37.2
40 primary · 75.6 efficiency · 5.7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8889
Amite · Amite, LA
- Committed To
- Mississippi State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
454
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.