Usage Score
11.4
Player Dossier
2014-2018Michigan
Chase Winovich
LB • 6'3" • 255 lbs • Clairton, PA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Chase Winovich shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
35.7
Consistency
38.2
Season Value
29
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Michigan
1415161617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chase Winovich, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Michigan. Chase Winovich shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.7 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Michigan paired 28.5 primary output with 43.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 35.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Michigan
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.6
Efficiency
35.7
Usage
11.4
Consistency
38.2
Best Game by takeover score
Florida
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida: 4. Notre Dame: 3.5. Western Michigan: 0. SMU: 3. Nebraska: 2. Northwestern: 4. Maryland: 0. Wisconsin: 0. Michigan State: 0.5. Penn State: 2. Rutgers: 0. Indiana: 1. Ohio State: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 7 by 69.2. Notre Dame: 8 by 68.3. Western Michigan: 2 by 8.3. SMU: 8 by 63.3. Nebraska: 2 by 28.3. Northwestern: 9 by 77.5. Maryland: 2 by 8.3. Wisconsin: 4 by 16.7. Michigan State: 4 by 21.7. Penn State: 2 by 28.3. Rutgers: 5 by 20.8. Indiana: 4 by 26.7. Ohio State: 4 by 26.7
Split Comparison
Wins1.3 · n=10 · -1.6 vs Losses
Losses2.8 · n=3 · +1.6 vs Wins
First Half2.4 · n=7 · +1.6 vs Second Half
Second Half0.8 · n=6 · -1.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Northwestern
Best efficiency game
77.5 vs Northwestern
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/29 | vs FloridaSplash game | L 15-41 | 7 | 3 | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Ohio State | L 39-62 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Indiana | W 31-20 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Rutgers | W 42-7 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Penn State | W 42-7 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Michigan State | W 21-7 | 4 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Wisconsin | W 38-13 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Maryland | W 42-21 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | @ NorthwesternSplash game | W 20-17 | 9 | 8 | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Nebraska | W 56-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs SMUSplash game | W 45-20 | 8 | 5 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Western Michigan | W 49-3 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Notre DameSplash game | L 17-24 | 8 | 3 | — | 3 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142015201620162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Michigan | 13.5 | 20.3 | 6.3 | 13.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan | 13.5 | 20.3 | 6.3 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan | 28.5 | 43.6 | 13.3 | 15 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan | 28.5 | 43.6 | 13.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Michigan | 21 | 35.7 | 11.4 | -7.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan | 21 | 35.7 | 11.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 72.5 takeover score.
#2
Northwestern
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 65.8 takeover score.
#3
Florida
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 63.9 takeover score.
#4
Notre Dame
3.5
Primary metric
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 60.5 takeover score.
#5
SMU
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Michigan
28.5 primary output · 43.6 efficiency · 13.3 usage
39.6
#2
2017 Regular Season · Michigan
39.6
28.5 primary · 43.6 efficiency · 13.3 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Michigan
29
21 primary · 35.7 efficiency · 11.4 usage
Milestones
4
Impact games
8
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8967
Thomas Jefferson · Clairton, PA
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
162
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.