Usage Score
40.5
Player Dossier
2016-2019Minnesota
Tyler Johnson
WR • 6'2" • 205 lbs • Minneapolis, MN, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Tyler Johnson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
87.4
Consistency
70.5
Season Value
74.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Minnesota
161718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Minnesota
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyler Johnson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Minnesota. Tyler Johnson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Minnesota paired 1,169 primary output with 88.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 87.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Minnesota
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
101.4
Efficiency
87.4
Usage
40.5
Consistency
70.5
Best Game by takeover score
Auburn
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Auburn: 204. Unknown: 28. Fresno State: 71. Georgia Southern: 140. Purdue: 73. Illinois: 38. Nebraska: 109. Rutgers: 130. Maryland: 37. Penn State: 104. Iowa: 170. Northwestern: 125. Wisconsin: 89
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Auburn: 12 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 62.2. Fresno State: 4 by 100. Georgia Southern: 10 by 93.3. Purdue: 8 by 60.8. Illinois: 3 by 84.4. Nebraska: 5 by 100. Rutgers: 6 by 100. Maryland: 4 by 61.7. Penn State: 7 by 99. Iowa: 9 by 100. Northwestern: 7 by 100. Wisconsin: 8 by 74.2
Split Comparison
Wins103.1 · n=10 · -26.4 vs Losses
Losses129.5 · n=2 · +26.4 vs Wins
First Half94.7 · n=7 · -14.5 vs Second Half
Second Half109.2 · n=6 · +14.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Auburn
Best efficiency game
100 vs Auburn
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | @ Auburn100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-24 | — | 12 | 204 | 17 | 17 | 2 | 73 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs WisconsinHigh volume | L 17-38 | — | 8 | 89 | 11.1 | 11.10 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Northwestern100 receiving yards | W 38-22 | — | 7 | 125 | 17.9 | 17.90 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Iowa100 receiving yards · High volume | L 19-23 | — | 9 | 170 | 18.9 | 18.90 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Penn State100 receiving yards | W 31-26 | — | 7 | 104 | 14.9 | 14.90 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Maryland | W 52-10 | — | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Rutgers100 receiving yards | W 42-7 | — | 6 | 130 | 21.7 | 21.70 | 1 | 56 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Nebraska100 receiving yards | W 34-7 | — | 5 | 109 | 21.8 | 21.80 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Illinois | W 40-17 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ PurdueHigh volume | W 38-31 | — | 8 | 73 | 9.1 | 9.10 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Georgia Southern100 receiving yards · High volume | W 35-32 | — | 10 | 140 | 14 | 14 | 3 | 73 |
| Sun 9/8 | @ Fresno State | W 38-35 | — | 4 | 71 | 14 | 17.80 | 0 | 34 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Minnesota
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201620172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Minnesota | 141 | 59.2 | 13.3 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Minnesota | 677 | 87.5 | 33.6 | 536 |
| 2018 Postseason | Minnesota | 1,169 | 88.4 | 41.9 | 492 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Minnesota | 1,169 | 88.4 | 41.9 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Minnesota | 1,318 | 87.4 | 40.5 | 149 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Minnesota | 1,318 | 87.4 | 40.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Auburn
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
204
Primary metric
204 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Nebraska
184
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
184 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Oregon State
127
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
127 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Miami (OH)
133
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
133 receiving yards with a 98.5 efficiency score.
#5
Buffalo
141
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
141 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Minnesota
1,169 primary output · 88.4 efficiency · 41.9 usage
76
#2
2018 Regular Season · Minnesota
76
1,169 primary · 88.4 efficiency · 41.9 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Minnesota
74.6
1,318 primary · 87.4 efficiency · 40.5 usage
Milestones
16
100+ receiving yards
10
8+ catch outings
7
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8583
Whitefield Academy · Mableton, GA
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
3,305
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.