Player Stats

Chaz Powell College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Touchdowns
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2008 Regular SeasonPenn State60-0--250
2009 PostseasonPenn State110-0--050
2009 Regular SeasonPenn State110-0--350
2010 Regular SeasonPenn State110-0--150
2011 PostseasonPenn State130-0--036.1
2011 Regular SeasonPenn State130-0--136.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season

Penn State paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.

Supporting note

2011 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 3.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Indiana

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2011 Postseason · Penn State

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

0.2

Efficiency

3.1

Usage

Consistency

5.1

Best Game by takeover score

Indiana

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Houston: 0. Indiana State: 0. Alabama: 0. Temple: 1. Eastern Michigan: 0. Indiana: 1. Iowa: 0. Purdue: 0. Northwestern: 0. Illinois: 0. Nebraska: 0. Ohio State: 0. Wisconsin: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.2 · Games = 9 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 4 · -0.2 vs Wins