Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Penn State paired 2 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Player Stats
Drew Astorino College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Penn State | 2 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 73.3 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Penn State | 10 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 18.4 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Penn State | 3 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 22.6 |
| 2011 Postseason | Penn State | 8 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 18.9 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Penn State | 8 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 18.9 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 2.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana State
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Penn State
Games
8
Havoc Plays / G
0.1
Efficiency
2.5
Usage
—
Consistency
4.2
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 0. Indiana State: 1. Temple: 0. Eastern Michigan: 0. Northwestern: 0. Illinois: 0. Nebraska: 0. Wisconsin: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.2 · Games = 5 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 3 · -0.2 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Drew Astorino
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.