Usage Score
20.4
Player Dossier
2007-2011Fresno State
Devon Wylie
WR • 5'9" • Roseville, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Devon Wylie reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74
Consistency
58.4
Season Value
61.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Fresno State
07080809091011
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Fresno State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Devon Wylie, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Fresno State. Devon Wylie reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Fresno State paired 716 primary output with 74 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 74 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2011 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · Fresno State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
55.1
Efficiency
74
Usage
20.4
Consistency
58.4
Best Game by takeover score
San Diego State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. California: 75. Nebraska: 50. Unknown: 0. Idaho: 30. Ole Miss: 59. Boise State: 12. Utah State: -4. Nevada: 108. Louisiana Tech: 149. New Mexico State: 31. Hawai'i: 59. San José State: 50. San Diego State: 97
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. California: 5 by 100. Nebraska: 4 by 83.3. Idaho: 3 by 66.7. Ole Miss: 4 by 98.3. Boise State: 2 by 40. Utah State: 1 by 0. Nevada: 5 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 13 by 76.4. New Mexico State: 3 by 68.9. Hawai'i: 5 by 78.7. San José State: 4 by 83.3. San Diego State: 7 by 92.4
Split Comparison
Wins28.3 · n=3 · -41.8 vs Losses
Losses70.1 · n=9 · +41.8 vs Wins
First Half31.7 · n=7 · -50.6 vs Second Half
Second Half82.3 · n=6 · +50.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Best efficiency game
100 vs Nevada
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/4 | @ San Diego State | L 28-35 | — | 7 | 97 | 13.9 | 13.90 | 0 | 39 |
| Sun 11/27 | vs San José State | L 24-27 | — | 4 | 50 | 11.4 | 12.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ Hawai'i | W 24-21 | — | 5 | 59 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ New Mexico State | L 45-48 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 11/6 | vs Louisiana Tech100 receiving yards · High volume | L 21-41 | — | 13 | 149 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Nevada100 receiving yards | L 38-45 | — | 5 | 108 | 19.2 | 21.60 | 0 | 71 |
| Sun 10/16 | vs Utah State | W 31-21 | — | 1 | -4 | -2.5 | -4 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Boise State | L 7-57 | — | 2 | 12 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 10/2 | vs Ole Miss | L 28-38 | — | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Idaho | W 48-24 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 9/18 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | 2 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Nebraska | L 29-42 | — | 4 | 50 | 11 | 12.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ California | L 21-36 | — | 5 | 75 | 15.3 | 15 | 0 | 56 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Fresno State
2007-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
2007200820082009200920102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Fresno State | 44 | 100 | 4.8 | — |
| 2008 Postseason | Fresno State | 269 | 67.7 | 16.6 | 225 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Fresno State | 269 | 67.7 | 16.6 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Fresno State | 259 | 80.7 | 16.5 | -10 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Fresno State | 259 | 80.7 | 16.5 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Fresno State | 39 | 100 | 11.1 | -220 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Fresno State | 716 | 74 | 20.4 | 677 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Wisconsin
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
114
Primary metric
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Wisconsin
62
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Cincinnati
39
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Louisiana Tech
149
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
149 receiving yards with a 76.4 efficiency score.
#5
Texas A&M
44
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Fresno State
716 primary output · 74 efficiency · 20.4 usage
61.5
#2
2010 Regular Season · Fresno State
54
39 primary · 100 efficiency · 11.1 usage
#3
2008 Postseason · Fresno State
47.4
269 primary · 67.7 efficiency · 16.6 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.7889
Granite Bay · Granite Bay, CA
- Committed To
- Fresno State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,327
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.