Player Stats

Bryant Ward College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
24
Rushing yards
6
Receiving yards
18
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2008 Regular SeasonOklahoma State1110130.3
2009 Regular SeasonOklahoma State4541018.5
2010 Regular SeasonOklahoma State318117044.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season

Oklahoma State paired 18 primary output with 38.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2010 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 38.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kansas State

Win with 14 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2010 Regular Season · Oklahoma State

Games

3

Scrimmage Yards / G

6

Efficiency

38.9

Usage

2.8

Consistency

29.4

Best Game by takeover score

Kansas State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 1. Kansas State: 14. Kansas: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 2 by 4.2. Kansas State: 1 by 100. Kansas: 2 by 12.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half7.5 · Games = 2 · +4.5 vs Second Half
Second Half3 · Games = 1 · -4.5 vs First Half