Player Stats

Tramain Swindall College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,698
Receptions
150
Touchdowns
10

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2008 PostseasonTexas Tech13433062.4
2008 Regular SeasonTexas Tech1342528262.4
2009 PostseasonTexas Tech12749065.5
2009 Regular SeasonTexas Tech1248645565.5
2010 PostseasonTexas Tech12331140.1
2010 Regular SeasonTexas Tech1230240040.1
2011 Regular SeasonTexas Tech816172243.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason

Texas Tech paired 694 primary output with 64.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2011 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 68.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kansas State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2011 Regular Season · Texas Tech

Games

8

Receiving Yards / G

21.5

Efficiency

68.2

Usage

5.4

Consistency

63

Best Game by takeover score

Kansas State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Texas State: 20. New Mexico: 26. Nevada: 8. Kansas: 4. Kansas State: 56. Oklahoma: 14. Missouri: 23. Baylor: 21

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas State: 1 by 100. New Mexico: 3 by 57.8. Nevada: 1 by 53.3. Kansas: 1 by 26.7. Kansas State: 4 by 93.3. Oklahoma: 1 by 93.3. Missouri: 3 by 51.1. Baylor: 2 by 70

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins14.4 · Games = 5 · -18.9 vs Losses
Losses33.3 · Games = 3 · +18.9 vs Wins