Player Stats

Michael Scarlett College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
178
Receptions
19
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2008 Regular SeasonNew Mexico611104060.6
2009 Regular SeasonNew Mexico0-00-
2010 Regular SeasonNew Mexico3219041.8
2011 Regular SeasonNew Mexico4655146.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season

New Mexico paired 104 primary output with 53.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2011 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 57.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Sam Houston

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2011 Regular Season · New Mexico

Games

4

Receiving Yards / G

13.8

Efficiency

57.5

Usage

6.5

Consistency

53.4

Best Game by takeover score

Sam Houston

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arkansas: 13. Sam Houston: 28. New Mexico State: 7. Air Force: 7

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas: 2 by 43.3. Sam Houston: 2 by 93.3. New Mexico State: 1 by 46.7. Air Force: 1 by 46.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half20.5 · Games = 2 · +13.5 vs Second Half
Second Half7 · Games = 2 · -13.5 vs First Half