Player Stats

Jock Sanders College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,980
Receptions
206
Touchdowns
20

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2007 PostseasonWest Virginia1216034.6
2007 Regular SeasonWest Virginia121196234.6
2008 PostseasonWest Virginia13570066.2
2008 Regular SeasonWest Virginia1348392966.2
2009 PostseasonWest Virginia13214077.1
2009 Regular SeasonWest Virginia1370674477.1
2010 PostseasonWest Virginia13558086.2
2010 Regular SeasonWest Virginia1364670586.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason

West Virginia paired 728 primary output with 72.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2010 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 72.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2010 Postseason · West Virginia

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

56

Efficiency

72.5

Usage

29

Consistency

75.6

Best Game by takeover score

Cincinnati

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. NC State: 58. Coastal Carolina: 71. Marshall: 57. Maryland: 86. LSU: 47. UNLV: 25. South Florida: 31. Syracuse: 53. UConn: 43. Cincinnati: 95. Louisville: 11. Pittsburgh: 70. Rutgers: 81

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. NC State: 5 by 77.3. Coastal Carolina: 8 by 59.2. Marshall: 5 by 76. Maryland: 6 by 95.6. LSU: 5 by 62.7. UNLV: 2 by 83.3. South Florida: 10 by 20.7. Syracuse: 3 by 100. UConn: 7 by 41. Cincinnati: 6 by 100. Louisville: 2 by 36.7. Pittsburgh: 4 by 100. Rutgers: 6 by 90

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins58.6 · Games = 9 · +8.3 vs Losses
Losses50.3 · Games = 4 · -8.3 vs Wins