Usage Score
22.2
Player Dossier
2007-2010Texas Tech
Detron Lewis
WR • 6'0" • College Station, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Detron Lewis reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
65.3
Consistency
64.5
Season Value
62.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Texas Tech
0707080809091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Texas Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Detron Lewis, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Texas Tech. Detron Lewis reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
Texas Tech paired 913 primary output with 77.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 65.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Texas Tech
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
65.5
Efficiency
65.3
Usage
22.2
Consistency
64.5
Best Game by takeover score
Northwestern
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 49. SMU: 79. New Mexico: 44. Texas: 42. Iowa State: 12. Baylor: 95. Oklahoma State: 28. Colorado: 84. Texas A&M: 111. Missouri: 64. Oklahoma: 59. Unknown: 50. Houston: 135
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 8 by 40.8. SMU: 6 by 87.8. New Mexico: 3 by 97.8. Texas: 6 by 46.7. Iowa State: 4 by 20. Baylor: 11 by 57.6. Oklahoma State: 5 by 37.3. Colorado: 6 by 93.3. Texas A&M: 8 by 92.5. Missouri: 8 by 53.3. Oklahoma: 7 by 56.2. Unknown: 4 by 83.3. Houston: 11 by 81.8
Split Comparison
Wins78.6 · n=7 · +28.2 vs Losses
Losses50.4 · n=5 · -28.2 vs Wins
First Half49.9 · n=7 · -34.0 vs Second Half
Second Half83.8 · n=6 · +34.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
97.8 vs New Mexico
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/1 | vs NorthwesternHigh volume | W 45-38 | — | 8 | 49 | 4.3 | 6.10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 11/28 | vs Houston100 receiving yards · High volume | W 35-20 | — | 11 | 135 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 2 | 50 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 50 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Oklahoma | L 7-45 | — | 7 | 59 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 11/7 | vs MissouriHigh volume | W 24-17 | — | 8 | 64 | 7.1 | 8 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Texas A&M100 receiving yards · High volume | L 27-45 | — | 8 | 111 | 13.9 | 13.90 | 0 | 54 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Colorado | W 27-24 | — | 6 | 84 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Oklahoma State | L 17-34 | — | 5 | 28 | 5.2 | 5.60 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs BaylorHigh volume | W 45-38 | — | 11 | 95 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Iowa State | L 38-52 | — | 4 | 12 | 3.4 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 9/19 | vs Texas | L 14-24 | — | 6 | 42 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 9/12 | @ New Mexico | W 52-17 | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 9/5 | vs SMU | W 35-27 | — | 6 | 79 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 1 | 22 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas Tech
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
20072007200820082009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Postseason | Texas Tech | 120 | 53.5 | 4.9 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 120 | 53.5 | 4.9 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Texas Tech | 913 | 77.1 | 16.3 | 793 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 913 | 77.1 | 16.3 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Texas Tech | 844 | 76.5 | 14.8 | -69 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 844 | 76.5 | 14.8 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Texas Tech | 852 | 65.3 | 22.2 | 8 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 852 | 65.3 | 22.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
146
Primary metric
146 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
163
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
163 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Houston
135
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
135 receiving yards with a 81.8 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
63
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Texas A&M
111
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
111 receiving yards with a 92.5 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Postseason · Texas Tech
913 primary output · 77.1 efficiency · 16.3 usage
65.9
#2
2008 Regular Season · Texas Tech
65.9
913 primary · 77.1 efficiency · 16.3 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Texas Tech
62.4
852 primary · 65.3 efficiency · 22.2 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
11
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.8556
A&M Consolidated · College Station, TX
- Committed To
- Texas Tech
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,729
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.