Usage Score
23.3
Player Dossier
2007-2011Michigan
Junior Hemingway
WR • 6'1" • Conway, SC, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Junior Hemingway reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
87.7
Consistency
49.1
Season Value
65
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Michigan
0707080910101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Junior Hemingway, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Michigan. Junior Hemingway reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Michigan paired 662 primary output with 87.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 87.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Michigan
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
60.2
Efficiency
87.7
Usage
23.3
Consistency
49.1
Best Game by takeover score
Virginia Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Virginia Tech: 63. Notre Dame: 165. San Diego State: 9. Minnesota: 56. Northwestern: 124. Michigan State: 43. Purdue: 16. Iowa: 64. Illinois: 43. Nebraska: 34. Ohio State: 45
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Virginia Tech: 2 by 100. Notre Dame: 3 by 100. San Diego State: 1 by 60. Minnesota: 5 by 74.7. Northwestern: 5 by 100. Michigan State: 3 by 95.6. Purdue: 2 by 53.3. Iowa: 5 by 85.3. Illinois: 3 by 95.6. Nebraska: 2 by 100. Ohio State: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins61.7 · n=9 · +8.2 vs Losses
Losses53.5 · n=2 · -8.2 vs Wins
First Half76.7 · n=6 · +36.3 vs Second Half
Second Half40.4 · n=5 · -36.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
100 vs Virginia Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/4 | @ Virginia Tech2+ TD | W 23-20 | — | 2 | 63 | 31.5 | 31.50 | 2 | 45 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Ohio State | W 40-34 | — | 2 | 45 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Nebraska | W 45-17 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Illinois | W 31-14 | — | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Iowa | L 16-24 | — | 5 | 64 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Purdue | W 36-14 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Michigan State | L 14-28 | — | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Northwestern100 receiving yards | W 42-24 | — | 5 | 124 | 24.8 | 24.80 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Minnesota | W 58-0 | — | 5 | 56 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs San Diego State | W 28-7 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 9/11 | vs Notre Dame100 receiving yards | W 35-31 | — | 3 | 165 | 55 | 55 | 1 | 77 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2007-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
20072007200820092010201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Postseason | Michigan | 37 | 50 | 10.4 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Michigan | 37 | 50 | 10.4 | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Michigan | 41 | 100 | 10.5 | 4 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Michigan | 268 | 59.9 | 12.2 | 227 |
| 2010 Postseason | Michigan | 593 | 88.4 | 16.6 | 325 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Michigan | 593 | 88.4 | 16.6 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Michigan | 662 | 87.7 | 23.3 | 69 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Michigan | 662 | 87.7 | 23.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Western Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
103
Primary metric
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Iowa
134
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
134 receiving yards with a 99.3 efficiency score.
#3
Notre Dame
165
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
165 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Indiana
129
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
129 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Utah
41
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Michigan
662 primary output · 87.7 efficiency · 23.3 usage
65
#2
2011 Regular Season · Michigan
65
662 primary · 87.7 efficiency · 23.3 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Michigan
63.6
593 primary · 88.4 efficiency · 16.6 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.9239
Conway · Conway, SC
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,601
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.