Player Stats

Brad Gruner College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
1,760
Passing yards
1,359
Rushing yards
401
Touchdowns
8

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2008 Regular SeasonNew Mexico101,3681,037331667.5
2009 Regular SeasonNew Mexico1606041.7
2010 Regular SeasonNew Mexico438632264239.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season

New Mexico paired 1,368 primary output with 57.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2010 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 54.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State

Loss with 194 yards of offense and 61.2 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2010 Regular Season · New Mexico

Games

4

Primary Metric / G

96.5

Efficiency

54.3

Usage

13.3

Consistency

47.7

Best Game by takeover score

New Mexico State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Utah: 41. UTEP: 75. New Mexico State: 194. San Diego State: 76

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah: 16 by 45.5. UTEP: 23 by 40.8. New Mexico State: 29 by 61.2. San Diego State: 10 by 69.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half58 · Games = 2 · -77 vs Second Half
Second Half135 · Games = 2 · +77 vs First Half