Usage Score
18.8
Player Dossier
2007-2011Michigan
Toney Clemons
WR • 6'2" • New Kensington, PA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Toney Clemons reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.3
Consistency
51.4
Season Value
62.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Colorado
0708091011
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Michigan • Colorado
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Toney Clemons, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Colorado. Toney Clemons reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Colorado paired 680 primary output with 80.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2011 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, Colorado.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · Colorado
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
56.7
Efficiency
80.3
Usage
18.8
Consistency
51.4
Best Game by takeover score
Utah
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. California: 9. Colorado State: 65. Ohio State: 31. Washington State: 19. Stanford: 31. Washington: 18. Oregon: 31. Arizona State: 97. USC: 112. Arizona: 115. UCLA: 50. Utah: 102
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. California: 1 by 60. Colorado State: 3 by 100. Ohio State: 4 by 51.7. Washington State: 3 by 42.2. Stanford: 3 by 68.9. Washington: 2 by 60. Oregon: 2 by 100. Arizona State: 8 by 80.8. USC: 5 by 100. Arizona: 5 by 100. UCLA: 3 by 100. Utah: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins94 · n=3 · +49.8 vs Losses
Losses44.2 · n=9 · -49.8 vs Wins
First Half28.8 · n=6 · -55.7 vs Second Half
Second Half84.5 · n=6 · +55.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona
Best efficiency game
100 vs Utah
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/25 | @ Utah100 receiving yards | W 17-14 | — | 4 | 102 | 25.5 | 25.50 | 0 | 34 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ UCLA | L 6-45 | — | 3 | 50 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Arizona100 receiving yards | W 48-29 | — | 5 | 115 | 23 | 23 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs USC100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 17-42 | — | 5 | 112 | 22.4 | 22.40 | 2 | 45 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Arizona StateHigh volume | L 14-48 | — | 8 | 97 | 12.1 | 12.10 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Oregon | L 2-45 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Washington | L 24-52 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Stanford | L 7-48 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Washington State | L 27-31 | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Ohio State | L 17-37 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Colorado State | W 28-14 | — | 3 | 65 | 21.7 | 21.70 | 1 | 44 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs California | L 33-36 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2007-2008
Opening stop
- 2
Colorado
2009-2011
Final stop
Season Progression
20072008200920102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Michigan | 5 | 33.3 | 4.5 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Michigan | 101 | 55 | 13.2 | 96 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Colorado | 0 | — | — | -101 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Colorado | 482 | 68.5 | 18.3 | 482 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Colorado | 680 | 80.3 | 18.8 | 198 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arizona
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
115
Primary metric
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
USC
112
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Texas Tech
98
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
98 receiving yards with a 81.7 efficiency score.
#4
Utah
102
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Michigan State
29
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Colorado
680 primary output · 80.3 efficiency · 18.8 usage
62.3
#2
2010 Regular Season · Colorado
52.4
482 primary · 68.5 efficiency · 18.3 usage
#3
2007 Regular Season · Michigan
34.6
5 primary · 33.3 efficiency · 4.5 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.9412
Valley · New Kensington, PA
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,268
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.