Usage Score
13.3
Player Dossier
2008-2011Tulane
Joe Kemp
WR • 6'4" • North Richland Hills, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Joe Kemp reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
53.1
Consistency
37.3
Season Value
32.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Tulane
08091011
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Tulane
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Joe Kemp, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Tulane. Joe Kemp reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Tulane paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 53.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · Tulane
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
22.7
Efficiency
53.1
Usage
13.3
Consistency
37.3
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 83. Tulsa: 24. UAB: 54. Duke: 26. Army: 28. Syracuse: 19. UTEP: 6. Memphis: 6. East Carolina: 3. SMU: 9. Houston: 9. Rice: 5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 4 by 100. Tulsa: 4 by 40. UAB: 6 by 60. Duke: 3 by 57.8. Army: 3 by 62.2. Syracuse: 2 by 63.3. UTEP: 1 by 40. Memphis: 1 by 40. East Carolina: 1 by 20. SMU: 1 by 60. Houston: 1 by 60. Rice: 1 by 33.3
Split Comparison
Losses13.5 · n=10
First Half39 · n=6 · +32.7 vs Second Half
Second Half6.3 · n=6 · -32.7 vs First Half
All Games22.7 · n=12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/19 | @ Rice | L 7-19 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Fri 11/11 | vs Houston | L 17-73 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ SMU | L 24-45 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ East Carolina | L 13-34 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Memphis | L 17-33 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs UTEP | L 7-44 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 10/9 | vs Syracuse | L 34-37 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Army | L 6-45 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Duke | L 27-48 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ UAB | W 49-10 | — | 6 | 54 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Tulsa | L 3-31 | — | 4 | 24 | 2.4 | 6 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 83 | 20.8 | 20.80 | 0 | 43 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulane
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
2008200920102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Tulane | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Tulane | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Tulane | 154 | 66.5 | 10.9 | 154 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Tulane | 272 | 53.1 | 13.3 | 118 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
83
Primary metric
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Army
57
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 63.3 efficiency score.
#3
Rutgers
34
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UAB
54
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#5
Ole Miss
26
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · Tulane
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2009 Regular Season · Tulane
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Tulane
37.6
154 primary · 66.5 efficiency · 10.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.8067
Richland · North Richland Hills, TX
- Committed To
- Tulane
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
426
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.