Usage Score
10.7
Player Dossier
2008-2009Michigan State
Ashton Leggett
RB • 5'11" • Muskegon, MI, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Ashton Leggett leans balanced backfield option traits and 32.9 efficiency.
Efficiency
32.9
Consistency
13.5
Season Value
38.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Michigan State
0809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Michigan State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ashton Leggett, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Michigan State. Ashton Leggett leans balanced backfield option traits and 32.9 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Michigan State paired 130 primary output with 32.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 32.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2009 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Game with 43 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Michigan State
Games
4
Scrimmage Yards / G
32.5
Efficiency
32.9
Usage
10.7
Consistency
13.5
Best Game by takeover score
Northwestern
Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.
Game-by-Game Trend
Not enough games are available for a full trend line yet.
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northwestern
Best efficiency game
66.2 vs Northwestern
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/11 | @ Northwestern | — | 6 | 39 | 6.50 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6.1 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan State
2008-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
20082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Michigan State | 7 | 26.1 | 2.7 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Michigan State | 130 | 32.9 | 10.7 | 123 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Northwestern
Game with 43 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
43
Primary metric
43 scrimmage yards and — usage.
#2
Western Michigan
120
Primary metric
Win with 120 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
120 scrimmage yards and 22.9 usage.
#3
Eastern Michigan
8
Primary metric
Win with 8 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
8 scrimmage yards and 3.2 usage.
#4
Indiana
6
Primary metric
Win with 6 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
6 scrimmage yards and 1.5 usage.
#5
Purdue
9
Primary metric
Win with 9 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
9 scrimmage yards and 9.1 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Michigan State
130 primary output · 32.9 efficiency · 10.7 usage
38.3
#2
2008 Regular Season · Michigan State
19.8
7 primary · 26.1 efficiency · 2.7 usage
Milestones
1
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.82
Muskegon · Muskegon, MI
- Committed To
- Michigan State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
137
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 9 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.