Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Arizona paired 4,231 primary output with 57 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Michigan State | 1 | 57 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 58.4 |
| 2009 Postseason | Arizona | 12 | 29 | 48 | -19 | 0 | 48.6 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Arizona | 12 | 2,384 | 2,438 | -54 | 22 | 48.6 |
| 2010 Postseason | Arizona | 11 | 273 | 280 | -7 | 1 | 58 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Arizona | 11 | 2,805 | 2,911 | -106 | 20 | 58 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Arizona | 12 | 4,231 | 4,334 | -103 | 28 | 69.6 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Arizona paired 4,231 primary output with 57 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 57 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2011 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan State, Arizona.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northern Arizona
Win with 410 yards of offense and 65.9 efficiency. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
352.6
Efficiency
57
Usage
13.4
Consistency
91.8
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Arizona
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northern Arizona: 410. Oklahoma State: 398. Stanford: 202. Oregon: 356. USC: 419. Oregon State: 382. UCLA: 297. Washington: 376. Utah: 313. Colorado: 351. Arizona State: 372. Louisiana: 355
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Arizona: 44 by 65.9. Oklahoma State: 53 by 59.4. Stanford: 39 by 58.3. Oregon: 63 by 54.5. USC: 55 by 57.3. Oregon State: 47 by 60.3. UCLA: 45 by 57.1. Washington: 53 by 51.2. Utah: 46 by 50.7. Colorado: 57 by 49.7. Arizona State: 55 by 58.5. Louisiana: 46 by 61.4
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.