Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
SMU paired 3,298 primary output with 57 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | New Mexico State | 5 | 343 | 393 | -50 | 2 | 21.4 |
| 2008 Regular Season | New Mexico State | 4 | 216 | 246 | -30 | 0 | 34.1 |
| 2009 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2010 Regular Season | SMU | 3 | 17 | 33 | -16 | 0 | 17.2 |
| 2011 Postseason | SMU | 13 | 217 | 239 | -22 | 2 | 66.9 |
| 2011 Regular Season | SMU | 13 | 3,081 | 3,182 | -101 | 16 | 66.9 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
SMU paired 3,298 primary output with 57 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 57 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across New Mexico State, SMU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Win with 358 yards of offense and 82.6 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
253.7
Efficiency
57
Usage
12.9
Consistency
82.1
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 217. Texas A&M: 225. UTEP: 244. Northwestern State: 292. Memphis: 349. TCU: 341. UCF: 358. Southern Miss: 166. Tulsa: 147. Tulane: 310. Navy: 248. Houston: 227. Rice: 174
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 31 by 60.9. Texas A&M: 40 by 56. UTEP: 31 by 70.3. Northwestern State: 36 by 77.3. Memphis: 46 by 55.5. TCU: 48 by 51.7. UCF: 31 by 82.6. Southern Miss: 33 by 42.5. Tulsa: 42 by 35.8. Tulane: 43 by 59.9. Navy: 39 by 51.9. Houston: 47 by 49.3. Rice: 28 by 47.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.