Usage Score
4.4
Player Dossier
2008-2010Rice
Taylor Dupree
WR • 6'1" • Mesquite, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Taylor Dupree reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
40
Consistency
20.6
Season Value
25.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Rice
080910
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Rice
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Taylor Dupree, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Rice. Taylor Dupree reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Rice paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 40 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · Rice
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
9.6
Efficiency
40
Usage
4.4
Consistency
20.6
Best Game by takeover score
Houston
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 6. Baylor: 3. SMU: 4. UTEP: 2. Houston: 33
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 1 by 40. Baylor: 1 by 20. SMU: 1 by 26.7. UTEP: 1 by 13.3. Houston: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Losses3.8 · n=4
First Half4.3 · n=3 · -13.2 vs Second Half
Second Half17.5 · n=2 · +13.2 vs First Half
All Games9.6 · n=5
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
100 vs Houston
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rice
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
200820092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Rice | 134 | 57.8 | 8.1 | 134 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Rice | 48 | 40 | 4.4 | -86 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Houston
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
33
Primary metric
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UAB
22
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Navy
15
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
SMU
21
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#5
Oklahoma State
12
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · Rice
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2009 Regular Season · Rice
62.1
134 primary · 57.8 efficiency · 8.1 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Rice
25.1
48 primary · 40 efficiency · 4.4 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.7667
Poteet · Mesquite, TX
- Committed To
- Rice
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
182
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 15 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.