Usage Score
25.8
Player Dossier
2008-2010East Carolina
Darryl Freeney
WR • 5'11" • Suffolk, VA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Darryl Freeney reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
81.2
Consistency
49.4
Season Value
64.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · East Carolina
0808090910
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- East Carolina
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Darryl Freeney, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · East Carolina. Darryl Freeney reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
East Carolina paired 718 primary output with 81.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · East Carolina
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
65.3
Efficiency
81.2
Usage
25.8
Consistency
49.4
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas: 94. Unknown: 20. North Carolina: 0. UCF: 5. SMU: 31. Memphis: 116. Virginia Tech: 50. Tulsa: 152. UAB: 118. Southern Miss: 83. Houston: 49
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas: 6 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 44.4. UCF: 1 by 33.3. SMU: 2 by 100. Memphis: 5 by 100. Virginia Tech: 4 by 83.3. Tulsa: 8 by 100. UAB: 7 by 100. Southern Miss: 8 by 69.2. Houston: 4 by 81.7
Split Comparison
Wins87.2 · n=6 · +43.4 vs Losses
Losses43.8 · n=4 · -43.4 vs Wins
First Half44.3 · n=6 · -46.1 vs Second Half
Second Half90.4 · n=5 · +46.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arkansas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/2 | vs Arkansas | L 17-20 | — | 6 | 94 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 12/5 | vs Houston | W 38-32 | — | 4 | 49 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/28 | vs Southern MissHigh volume | W 25-20 | — | 8 | 83 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs UAB100 receiving yards | W 37-21 | — | 7 | 118 | 16.9 | 16.90 | 1 | 59 |
| Mon 11/16 | @ Tulsa100 receiving yards · High volume | W 44-17 | — | 8 | 152 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 37 |
| Fri 11/6 | vs Virginia Tech | L 3-16 | — | 4 | 50 | 11.8 | 12.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Wed 10/28 | @ Memphis100 receiving yards | W 38-19 | — | 5 | 116 | 23.2 | 23.20 | 1 | 31 |
| Sun 10/11 | @ SMU | L 21-28 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs UCF | W 19-14 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ North Carolina | L 17-31 | — | — | — | -7 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
East Carolina
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
20082008200920092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | East Carolina | 352 | 75.6 | 13.2 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | East Carolina | 352 | 75.6 | 13.2 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | East Carolina | 718 | 81.2 | 25.8 | 366 |
| 2009 Regular Season | East Carolina | 718 | 81.2 | 25.8 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | East Carolina | 0 | — | — | -718 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
152
Primary metric
152 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kentucky
112
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UTEP
106
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UAB
118
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Memphis
116
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · East Carolina
718 primary output · 81.2 efficiency · 25.8 usage
64.1
#2
2009 Regular Season · East Carolina
64.1
718 primary · 81.2 efficiency · 25.8 usage
#3
2008 Postseason · East Carolina
42.1
352 primary · 75.6 efficiency · 13.2 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.7
Nansemond River · Suffolk, VA
- Committed To
- East Carolina
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,070
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.