Usage Score
13.3
Player Dossier
2007-2011Oregon
Aaron Pflugrad
WR • 5'10" • Missoula, MT, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Aaron Pflugrad reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.3
Consistency
52.4
Season Value
60.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Arizona State
07070809101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Oregon • Arizona State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Missouri
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Aaron Pflugrad, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Arizona State. Aaron Pflugrad reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Arizona State paired 665 primary output with 77.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 77.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Oregon, Arizona State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Missouri
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Arizona State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
51.2
Efficiency
77.3
Usage
13.3
Consistency
52.4
Best Game by takeover score
Boise State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Boise State: 45. Unknown: 50. Missouri: 180. Illinois: 75. USC: 39. Oregon State: 31. Utah: 5. Oregon: 9. Colorado: 57. UCLA: 11. Washington State: 53. Arizona: 77. California: 33
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Boise State: 4 by 75. Unknown: 3 by 100. Missouri: 8 by 100. Illinois: 7 by 71.4. USC: 4 by 65. Oregon State: 3 by 68.9. Utah: 1 by 33.3. Oregon: 2 by 30. Colorado: 2 by 100. UCLA: 1 by 73.3. Washington State: 4 by 88.3. Arizona: 3 by 100. California: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins62.4 · n=5 · +19.1 vs Losses
Losses43.3 · n=7 · -19.1 vs Wins
First Half60.7 · n=7 · +20.7 vs Second Half
Second Half40 · n=6 · -20.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Missouri
Best efficiency game
100 vs California
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/23 | @ Boise State | L 24-56 | — | 4 | 45 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs California | L 38-47 | — | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 1 | 17 |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Arizona | L 27-31 | — | 3 | 77 | 25.7 | 25.70 | 0 | 58 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Washington State | L 27-37 | — | 4 | 53 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ UCLA | L 28-29 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Colorado | W 48-14 | — | 2 | 57 | 28.5 | 28.50 | 0 | 51 |
| Sun 10/16 | @ Oregon | L 27-41 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Utah | W 35-14 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 10/2 | vs Oregon State | W 35-20 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 9/25 | vs USC | W 43-22 | — | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Illinois | L 14-17 | — | 7 | 75 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Missouri100 receiving yards · High volume | W 37-30 | — | 8 | 180 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 2 | 60 |
| Fri 9/2 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 3 | 50 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 2 | 31 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oregon
2007-2008
Opening stop
- 2
Arizona State
2009-2011
Final stop
Season Progression
2007200720082009201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Postseason | Oregon | 168 | 58.5 | 12.1 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Oregon | 168 | 58.5 | 12.1 | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Oregon | 79 | 75.6 | 7.2 | -89 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Arizona State | 0 | — | — | -79 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Arizona State | 329 | 77.6 | 13 | 329 |
| 2011 Postseason | Arizona State | 665 | 77.3 | 13.3 | 336 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Arizona State | 665 | 77.3 | 13.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Missouri
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
180
Primary metric
180 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oregon State
26
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Washington
51
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 68 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
57
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 95 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
77
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 64.2 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Arizona State
665 primary output · 77.3 efficiency · 13.3 usage
60.7
#2
2011 Regular Season · Arizona State
60.7
665 primary · 77.3 efficiency · 13.3 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Arizona State
51.7
329 primary · 77.6 efficiency · 13 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.7889
Sheldon · Eugene, OR
- Committed To
- Oregon
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,241
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.