Player Stats

Bert Reed College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,022
Receptions
170
Touchdowns
13

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2008 PostseasonFlorida State10524057.4
2008 Regular SeasonFlorida State1018271357.4
2009 PostseasonFlorida State1320077.6
2009 Regular SeasonFlorida State1358710277.6
2010 PostseasonFlorida State13225075.9
2010 Regular SeasonFlorida State1356589375.9
2011 PostseasonFlorida State9118165.6
2011 Regular SeasonFlorida State928385465.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason

Florida State paired 710 primary output with 72.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2011 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 82.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Virginia

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2011 Postseason · Florida State

Games

9

Receiving Yards / G

44.8

Efficiency

82.4

Usage

18

Consistency

63.2

Best Game by takeover score

Virginia

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 18. UL Monroe: 43. Charleston Southern: 21. Maryland: 76. NC State: 49. Boston College: 35. Miami: 45. Virginia: 104. Florida: 12

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 1 by 100. UL Monroe: 4 by 71.7. Charleston Southern: 3 by 46.7. Maryland: 5 by 100. NC State: 5 by 65.3. Boston College: 3 by 77.8. Miami: 3 by 100. Virginia: 4 by 100. Florida: 1 by 80

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins37.4 · Games = 8 · -66.6 vs Losses
Losses104 · Games = 1 · +66.6 vs Wins