Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Florida State paired 710 primary output with 72.4 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | Florida State | 10 | 5 | 24 | 0 | 57.4 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Florida State | 10 | 18 | 271 | 3 | 57.4 |
| 2009 Postseason | Florida State | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 77.6 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Florida State | 13 | 58 | 710 | 2 | 77.6 |
| 2010 Postseason | Florida State | 13 | 2 | 25 | 0 | 75.9 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Florida State | 13 | 56 | 589 | 3 | 75.9 |
| 2011 Postseason | Florida State | 9 | 1 | 18 | 1 | 65.6 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Florida State | 9 | 28 | 385 | 4 | 65.6 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Florida State paired 710 primary output with 72.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Virginia
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
44.8
Efficiency
82.4
Usage
18
Consistency
63.2
Best Game by takeover score
Virginia
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 18. UL Monroe: 43. Charleston Southern: 21. Maryland: 76. NC State: 49. Boston College: 35. Miami: 45. Virginia: 104. Florida: 12
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 1 by 100. UL Monroe: 4 by 71.7. Charleston Southern: 3 by 46.7. Maryland: 5 by 100. NC State: 5 by 65.3. Boston College: 3 by 77.8. Miami: 3 by 100. Virginia: 4 by 100. Florida: 1 by 80
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.