Player Stats

Robert Turbin College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
4,160
Rushing yards
3,315
Receiving yards
845
Touchdowns
51

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2007 Regular SeasonUtah State117170044.5
2008 Regular SeasonUtah State127414852561050.2
2009 Regular SeasonUtah State121,7141,2964181885.4
2010 Regular SeasonUtah State00000-
2011 PostseasonUtah State131081017084.8
2011 Regular SeasonUtah State131,5801,4161642384.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season

Utah State paired 1,714 primary output with 67.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2011 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 63.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Idaho

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2011 Postseason · Utah State

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

129.8

Efficiency

63.7

Usage

33.5

Consistency

81.2

Best Game by takeover score

Idaho

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Ohio: 108. Auburn: 79. Weber State: 183. Colorado State: 115. BYU: 145. Wyoming: 130. Fresno State: 145. Louisiana Tech: 121. Hawai'i: 96. San José State: 142. Idaho: 208. Nevada: 97. New Mexico State: 119

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio: 21 by 53. Auburn: 23 by 34.2. Weber State: 19 by 90.1. Colorado State: 24 by 49.9. BYU: 11 by 100. Wyoming: 21 by 60.5. Fresno State: 16 by 87.8. Louisiana Tech: 19 by 58.2. Hawai'i: 17 by 63.5. San José State: 25 by 60. Idaho: 24 by 86.1. Nevada: 20 by 41.4. New Mexico State: 26 by 43.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins139.3 · Games = 7 · +20.5 vs Losses
Losses118.8 · Games = 6 · -20.5 vs Wins