Usage Score
11.6
Player Dossier
2007-2010Auburn
Kodi Burns
WR • 6'2" • Fort Smith, AR, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Kodi Burns reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
79.1
Consistency
39.3
Season Value
35.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason · Auburn
07070809091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Auburn
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kodi Burns, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason · Auburn. Kodi Burns reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Kodi Burns played WR for Auburn. Across 4 tracked seasons, Kodi Burns recorded 1,312 passing yards, 799 rushing yards, and 223 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2008 with Auburn.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason
Auburn paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 79.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 85.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Auburn
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
14.8
Efficiency
79.1
Usage
11.6
Consistency
39.3
Best Game by takeover score
Oregon
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 35. Arkansas State: 0. Mississippi State: 0. UL Monroe: 0. Kentucky: 33. Arkansas: 33. LSU: -2. Ole Miss: 20. Unknown: 26. Georgia: 0. Alabama: 32. South Carolina: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 1 by 100. Kentucky: 1 by 100. Arkansas: 2 by 100. LSU: 1 by 0. Ole Miss: 2 by 66.7. Unknown: 2 by 86.7. Alabama: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins13.7 · Games = 11
First Half16.8 · Games = 6 · +4.2 vs Second Half
Second Half12.7 · Games = 6 · -4.2 vs First Half
All Games14.8 · Games = 12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
100 vs Oregon
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/11 | @ Oregon | W 22-19 | — | 1 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 12/4 | @ South Carolina | W 56-17 | — | — | — | 1.5 | — | — | — |
| Fri 11/26 | @ Alabama | W 28-27 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Georgia | W 49-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 26 | 9.3 | 13 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Ole Miss | W 51-31 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs LSU | W 24-17 | — | 1 | -2 | -2 | -2 | 0 | -2 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Arkansas | W 65-43 | — | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Kentucky | W 37-34 | — | 1 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs UL Monroe | W 52-3 | — | — | — | 3 | — | — | — |
| Thu 9/9 | @ Mississippi State | W 17-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Arkansas State | W 52-26 | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Auburn
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
2007200720082009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Postseason | Auburn | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Auburn | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Auburn | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Auburn | 46 | 50.6 | 6.5 | 46 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Auburn | 46 | 50.6 | 6.5 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Auburn | 177 | 79.1 | 11.6 | 131 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Auburn | 177 | 79.1 | 11.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
33
Primary metric
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Alabama
32
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Northwestern
23
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Oregon
35
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Kentucky
33
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2007 Postseason · Auburn
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2007 Regular Season · Auburn
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Auburn
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.933
Northside · Fort Smith, AR
- Committed To
- Auburn
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
223
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.