Usage Score
16.5
Player Dossier
2008-2011SMU
Terrance Wilkerson
WR • 5'10" • DeSoto, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Terrance Wilkerson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.2
Consistency
65
Season Value
64.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · SMU
080909101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- SMU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Washington State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Terrance Wilkerson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · SMU. Terrance Wilkerson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
SMU paired 561 primary output with 76.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: TCU
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · SMU
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
46.8
Efficiency
76.2
Usage
16.5
Consistency
65
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 16. Texas A&M: 85. UTEP: 20. Unknown: 47. Memphis: 31. TCU: 97. UCF: 59. Southern Miss: 40. Tulsa: 28. Tulane: 44. Navy: 69. Houston: 25
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 1 by 100. Texas A&M: 6 by 94.4. UTEP: 2 by 66.7. Unknown: 1 by 100. Memphis: 4 by 51.7. TCU: 3 by 100. UCF: 3 by 100. Southern Miss: 3 by 88.9. Tulsa: 5 by 37.3. Tulane: 7 by 41.9. Navy: 5 by 92. Houston: 4 by 41.7
Split Comparison
Wins44.5 · n=6 · -4.9 vs Losses
Losses49.4 · n=5 · +4.9 vs Wins
First Half49.3 · n=6 · +5.2 vs Second Half
Second Half44.2 · n=6 · -5.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
TCU
Best efficiency game
100 vs Pittsburgh
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/7 | @ Pittsburgh | W 28-6 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Houston | L 7-37 | — | 4 | 25 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Navy | L 17-24 | — | 5 | 69 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Tulane | W 45-24 | — | 7 | 44 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Tulsa | L 7-38 | — | 5 | 28 | 5.6 | 5.60 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 10/23 | @ Southern Miss | L 3-27 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs UCF | W 38-17 | — | 3 | 59 | 19.7 | 19.70 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ TCU | W 40-33 | — | 3 | 97 | 32.3 | 32.30 | 1 | 71 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Memphis | W 42-0 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/18 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 47 | 47 | 47 | 0 | 47 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs UTEP | W 28-17 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 9/4 | @ Texas A&M | L 14-46 | — | 6 | 85 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 0 | 28 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
SMU
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
200820092009201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | SMU | 233 | 64.9 | 13.3 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | SMU | 527 | 75 | 15 | 294 |
| 2009 Regular Season | SMU | 527 | 75 | 15 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | -527 |
| 2011 Postseason | SMU | 561 | 76.2 | 16.5 | 561 |
| 2011 Regular Season | SMU | 561 | 76.2 | 16.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Washington State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
113
Primary metric
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Texas Tech
53
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
TCU
97
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Texas A&M
85
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 94.4 efficiency score.
#5
Navy
69
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 92 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · SMU
561 primary output · 76.2 efficiency · 16.5 usage
64.4
#2
2011 Regular Season · SMU
64.4
561 primary · 76.2 efficiency · 16.5 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · SMU
61
527 primary · 75 efficiency · 15 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.7444
DeSoto · DeSoto, TX
- Committed To
- SMU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,321
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.