Usage / Role
7%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2008-2011SMU
WR • 5'10" • DeSoto, TX, USA
Terrance Wilkerson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
7%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
13
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
18
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · SMU
Snapshot
Player Story
Terrance Wilkerson built his college career from 2008 through 2011 as a wide receiver from DeSoto, TX wearing No. 18, spending time with SMU. The clearest part of Terrance Wilkerson's career was his receiving role:...
Read the storyTerrance Wilkerson, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · SMU. Terrance Wilkerson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | SMU | 8 | 24 | 233 | 2 | 55.7 |
| 2009 Postseason | SMU | 13 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 69.2 |
| 2009 Regular Season | SMU | 13 | 40 | 509 | 4 | 69.2 |
| 2010 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2011 Postseason | SMU | 12 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 74.1 |
| 2011 Regular Season | SMU | 12 | 43 | 545 | 2 | 74.1 |
Related Context
Terrance Wilkerson played WR for SMU. Across 4 tracked seasons, Terrance Wilkerson recorded 1,321 receiving yards and 8 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2011 with SMU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
SMU paired 561 primary output with 76.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
46.8
Efficiency
76.2
Usage
16.5
Consistency
65
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 16. Texas A&M: 85. UTEP: 20. Northwestern State: 47. Memphis: 31. TCU: 97. UCF: 59. Southern Miss: 40. Tulsa: 28. Tulane: 44. Navy: 69. Houston: 25
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 1 by 100. Texas A&M: 6 by 94.4. UTEP: 2 by 66.7. Northwestern State: 1 by 100. Memphis: 4 by 51.7. TCU: 3 by 100. UCF: 3 by 100. Southern Miss: 3 by 88.9. Tulsa: 5 by 37.3. Tulane: 7 by 41.9. Navy: 5 by 92. Houston: 4 by 41.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
100 vs Pittsburgh
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/7 | @ Pittsburgh | W 28-6 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Houston | L 7-37 | — | 4 | 25 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Navy | L 17-24 | — | 5 | 69 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Tulane | W 45-24 | — | 7 | 44 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Tulsa | L 7-38 | — | 5 | 28 | 5.6 | 5.60 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 10/23 | @ Southern Miss | L 3-27 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs UCF | W 38-17 | — | 3 | 59 | 19.7 | 19.70 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ TCU | W 40-33 | — | 3 | 97 | 32.3 | 32.30 | 1 | 71 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Memphis | W 42-0 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/18 | vs Northwestern State | W 40-7 | — | 1 | 47 | 47 | 47 | 0 | 47 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs UTEP | W 28-17 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 9/4 | @ Texas A&M | L 14-46 | — | 6 | 85 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 0 | 28 |
Player Story
Terrance Wilkerson built his college career from 2008 through 2011 as a wide receiver from DeSoto, TX wearing No. 18, spending time with SMU. The clearest part of Terrance Wilkerson's career was his receiving role: 110 catches, 1,321 receiving yards, and 8 touchdowns across 33 career games in the available record. That gives Terrance Wilkerson's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
SMU
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | SMU | 233 | 64.9 | 13.3 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | SMU | 527 | 75 | 15 | 294 |
| 2009 Regular Season | SMU | 527 | 75 | 15 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | -527 |
| 2011 Postseason | SMU | 561 | 76.2 | 16.5 | 561 |
| 2011 Regular Season | SMU | 561 | 76.2 | 16.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ Texas A&M
Week 1 · L 14-46
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
85
Receiving Yards
89.7 takeover
85 receiving yards with a 94.4 efficiency score.
#2
@ Washington State
Week 3 · L 27-30
113
Receiving Yards
86.1 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
@ Texas Tech
Week 3 · L 7-43
53
Receiving Yards
85.2 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
@ TCU
Week 5 · W 40-33
97
Receiving Yards
81.1 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
vs Navy
Week 11 · L 17-24
69
Receiving Yards
75.7 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 92 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Postseason · SMU
561 primary output · 76.2 efficiency · 16.5 usage
74.1
#2
2011 Regular Season · SMU
74.1
561 primary · 76.2 efficiency · 16.5 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · SMU
69.2
527 primary · 75 efficiency · 15 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.