Usage Score
21.5
Player Dossier
2007-2010SMU
Aldrick Robinson
WR • 5'10" • Waxahachie, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Aldrick Robinson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
94.8
Consistency
68.7
Season Value
71.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · SMU
070809091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- SMU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Aldrick Robinson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · SMU. Aldrick Robinson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
SMU paired 1,301 primary output with 94.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 94.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · SMU
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
92.9
Efficiency
94.8
Usage
21.5
Consistency
68.7
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Army: 76. Texas Tech: 50. UAB: 51. Washington State: 111. TCU: 61. Rice: 148. Tulsa: 118. Navy: 41. Houston: 101. Tulane: 182. UTEP: 131. Marshall: 59. East Carolina: 129. UCF: 43
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Army: 5 by 100. Texas Tech: 3 by 100. UAB: 4 by 85. Washington State: 4 by 100. TCU: 5 by 81.3. Rice: 6 by 100. Tulsa: 5 by 100. Navy: 4 by 68.3. Houston: 5 by 100. Tulane: 5 by 100. UTEP: 9 by 97. Marshall: 2 by 100. East Carolina: 5 by 100. UCF: 3 by 95.6
Split Comparison
Wins114 · n=7 · +42.1 vs Losses
Losses71.9 · n=7 · -42.1 vs Wins
First Half87.9 · n=7 · -10.1 vs Second Half
Second Half98 · n=7 · +10.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
100 vs Army
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/30 | vs Army | L 14-16 | — | 5 | 76 | 15.2 | 15.20 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 12/4 | @ UCF | L 7-17 | — | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 1 | 22 |
| Fri 11/26 | @ East Carolina100 receiving yards | W 45-38 | — | 5 | 129 | 25.8 | 25.80 | 1 | 53 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Marshall | W 31-17 | — | 2 | 59 | 29.5 | 29.50 | 1 | 41 |
| Sun 11/7 | @ UTEP100 receiving yards · High volume | L 14-28 | — | 9 | 131 | 14.6 | 14.60 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Tulane100 receiving yards | W 31-17 | — | 5 | 182 | 36.4 | 36.40 | 1 | 82 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Houston100 receiving yards | L 20-45 | — | 5 | 101 | 20.2 | 20.20 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Navy | L 21-28 | — | 4 | 41 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 1 | 13 |
| Sun 10/10 | vs Tulsa100 receiving yards | W 21-18 | — | 5 | 118 | 23.6 | 23.60 | 0 | 53 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Rice100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 42-31 | — | 6 | 148 | 24.7 | 24.70 | 2 | 51 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs TCU | L 24-41 | — | 5 | 61 | 12.2 | 12.20 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Washington State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 35-21 | — | 4 | 111 | 27.8 | 27.80 | 3 | 67 |
| Sun 9/12 | vs UAB | W 28-7 | — | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 9/5 | @ Texas Tech | L 27-35 | — | 3 | 50 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 0 | 26 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
SMU
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
200720082009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | SMU | 166 | 89.3 | 11.5 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | SMU | 1,047 | 84.8 | 25.3 | 881 |
| 2009 Postseason | SMU | 800 | 90.3 | 16.4 | -247 |
| 2009 Regular Season | SMU | 800 | 90.3 | 16.4 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | SMU | 1,301 | 94.8 | 21.5 | 501 |
| 2010 Regular Season | SMU | 1,301 | 94.8 | 21.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCF
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
210
Primary metric
210 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Nevada
176
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
176 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Tulane
182
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
182 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Houston
186
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
186 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
172
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
172 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · SMU
1,301 primary output · 94.8 efficiency · 21.5 usage
71.3
#2
2010 Regular Season · SMU
71.3
1,301 primary · 94.8 efficiency · 21.5 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · SMU
64.4
1,047 primary · 84.8 efficiency · 25.3 usage
Milestones
14
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.7667
Waxahachie · Waxahachie, TX
- Committed To
- SMU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
3,314
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.