Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
NC State paired 3,998 primary output with 58.5 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | NC State | 11 | 232 | 186 | 46 | 1 | 67.8 |
| 2008 Regular Season | NC State | 11 | 2,111 | 1,769 | 342 | 20 | 67.8 |
| 2009 Regular Season | NC State | 12 | 3,287 | 3,027 | 260 | 35 | 70.8 |
| 2010 Postseason | NC State | 13 | 316 | 275 | 41 | 2 | 78.3 |
| 2010 Regular Season | NC State | 13 | 3,682 | 3,288 | 394 | 35 | 78.3 |
| 2011 Postseason | Wisconsin | 14 | 314 | 296 | 18 | 3 | 67.7 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 14 | 3,199 | 2,879 | 320 | 37 | 67.7 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
NC State paired 3,998 primary output with 58.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 73.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across NC State, Wisconsin.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northern Illinois
Win with 384 yards of offense and 80.9 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Primary Metric / G
250.9
Efficiency
73.1
Usage
13.3
Consistency
80.1
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 314. UNLV: 317. Oregon State: 200. Northern Illinois: 384. South Dakota: 343. Nebraska: 287. Indiana: 208. Michigan State: 253. Ohio State: 241. Purdue: 281. Minnesota: 197. Illinois: 84. Penn State: 222. Michigan State: 182
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 31 by 72.2. UNLV: 15 by 94.2. Oregon State: 25 by 70.9. Northern Illinois: 37 by 80.9. South Dakota: 30 by 69. Nebraska: 26 by 80.8. Indiana: 19 by 88. Michigan State: 29 by 63.6. Ohio State: 38 by 57.1. Purdue: 30 by 84.1. Minnesota: 24 by 77.1. Illinois: 17 by 58.7. Penn State: 36 by 67.6. Michigan State: 31 by 58.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.