Usage Score
4.3
Player Dossier
2009-2011Toledo
TE • 6'5" • Elyria, OH, USA
Danny Noble reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
4.3
Efficiency
85
Consistency
67.4
Season Value
46.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Toledo
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Danny Noble, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Toledo. Danny Noble reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Toledo paired 257 primary output with 64.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 85 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2011 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
18.8
Efficiency
85
Usage
4.3
Consistency
67.4
Best Game by takeover score
Syracuse
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 8. Ohio State: 13. Boise State: 24. Syracuse: 30
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 53.3. Ohio State: 1 by 86.7. Boise State: 1 by 100. Syracuse: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Syracuse
Best efficiency game
100 vs Syracuse
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Toledo
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Toledo | 257 | 64.8 | 12.9 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Toledo | 223 | 63.6 | 12.1 | -34 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Toledo | 223 | 63.6 | 12.1 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Toledo | 75 | 85 | 4.3 | -148 |
#1 Featured game
Eastern Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
80
Primary metric
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Colorado
56
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 74.7 efficiency score.
#3
Syracuse
30
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Boise State
24
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Bowling Green
39
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Toledo
257 primary output · 64.8 efficiency · 12.9 usage
58.7
#2
2010 Postseason · Toledo
53.3
223 primary · 63.6 efficiency · 12.1 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Toledo
53.3
223 primary · 63.6 efficiency · 12.1 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2007 · Rating 0.7444
Elyria · Elyria, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
555
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Danny Noble quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit