Usage Score
9.4
Player Dossier
2009-2010Toledo
WR • 6'1" • Irwin, PA, USA
Tim Cortazzo reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
9.4
Efficiency
56.9
Consistency
47.3
Season Value
53.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Toledo
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tim Cortazzo, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Toledo. Tim Cortazzo reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Toledo paired 64 primary output with 86.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 56.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
19
Efficiency
56.9
Usage
9.4
Consistency
47.3
Best Game by takeover score
Florida International
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 55. Arizona: -3. Kent State: 16. Ball State: 22. Eastern Michigan: 4. Bowling Green: 35. Central Michigan: 4
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 4 by 91.7. Arizona: 1 by 0. Kent State: 2 by 53.3. Ball State: 1 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 26.7. Bowling Green: 1 by 100. Central Michigan: 1 by 26.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida International
Best efficiency game
100 vs Bowling Green
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Toledo
2009-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Toledo | 64 | 86.7 | 4.9 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Toledo | 133 | 56.9 | 9.4 | 69 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Toledo | 133 | 56.9 | 9.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Florida International
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
55
Primary metric
55 receiving yards with a 91.7 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio State
29
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Northern Illinois
26
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Bowling Green
35
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ball State
22
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Toledo
64 primary output · 86.7 efficiency · 4.9 usage
61.7
#2
2010 Postseason · Toledo
53.4
133 primary · 56.9 efficiency · 9.4 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Toledo
53.4
133 primary · 56.9 efficiency · 9.4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2007 · Rating 0.7922
Penn Trafford · Harrison City, PA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
197
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Tim Cortazzo quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit