Usage / Role
48%
Rotational offensive role
lowfeatured
Player Dossier
2009-2010Toledo
Tim Cortazzo
WR • 6'1" • Irwin, PA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Tim Cortazzo reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Impact Production
46
Developing production for a receiver
lowelite
Reliability
70
Reliable weekly contributor
lowhigh
Star Power
39
Limited ceiling signals so far
limitedstar
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · Toledo
091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Unique Seasons
- 2
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
2★
- Committed To
- Toledo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Tim Cortazzo, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · Toledo. Tim Cortazzo reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Receiving yards
- 197
- Receptions
- 14
- Touchdowns
- 2
Quick Answers
Tim Cortazzo quick answers
- Latest team and position
- Toledo · WR
- Career Receiving Yards
- 197
- Tracked sample
- 2 unique seasons · 3 entries · 10 games
- Best season
- 2010 Postseason · Toledo
- Top game
- Florida International
- Recruit profile
- 2-star · Penn Trafford · Toledo
- High school pipeline
- Penn Trafford · 5 FBS recruits · 0 drafted players
- Latest roster
- No. 80 · Class 2010
- 2010 Receiving yards rank
- 133 receiving yards · WR 485th (top 60%) · Mid-American 68th (top 39%) · National 705th (top 42%)
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Toledo | 3 | 3 | 64 | 1 | 56.5 |
| 2010 Postseason | Toledo | 7 | 4 | 55 | 0 | 58.9 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Toledo | 7 | 7 | 78 | 1 | 58.9 |
Related Context
Keep exploring Tim Cortazzo
Tim Cortazzo played WR for Toledo. Across 2 tracked seasons, Tim Cortazzo recorded 197 receiving yards and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Toledo.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Toledo paired 133 primary output with 56.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 56.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Toledo
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
19
Efficiency
56.9
Usage
9.4
Consistency
47.3
Best Game by takeover score
Florida International
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 55. Arizona: -3. Kent State: 16. Ball State: 22. Eastern Michigan: 4. Bowling Green: 35. Central Michigan: 4
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 4 by 91.7. Arizona: 1 by 0. Kent State: 2 by 53.3. Ball State: 1 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 26.7. Bowling Green: 1 by 100. Central Michigan: 1 by 26.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins16.2 · Games = 5 · -9.8 vs Losses
Losses26 · Games = 2 · +9.8 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida International
Best efficiency game
100 vs Bowling Green
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2009-2010
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Toledo | 64 | 86.7 | 4.9 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Toledo | 133 | 56.9 | 9.4 | 69 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Toledo | 133 | 56.9 | 9.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
vs Florida International
Week 1 · L 32-34 · Postseason
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
55
Receiving Yards
93.6 takeover
55 receiving yards with a 91.7 efficiency score.
#2
vs Ohio State
Week 3 · L 0-38
29
Receiving Yards
71.7 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
vs Northern Illinois
Week 7 · W 20-19 · Conference game
26
Receiving Yards
69.1 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
vs Bowling Green
Week 12 · W 33-14 · Conference game
35
Receiving Yards
61.1 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
vs Ball State
Week 8 · W 31-24 · Conference game
22
Receiving Yards
54.6 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Postseason · Toledo
133 primary output · 56.9 efficiency · 9.4 usage
58.9
#2
2010 Regular Season · Toledo
58.9
133 primary · 56.9 efficiency · 9.4 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Toledo
56.5
64 primary · 86.7 efficiency · 4.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Keep exploring Tim Cortazzo
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.