Player Dossier

2009-2010

Toledo

Tim Cortazzo

WR • 6'1" • Irwin, PA, USA

Reliable chain-moverPossession profile

Tim Cortazzo reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

9.4

Efficiency

56.9

Consistency

47.3

Season Value

53.4

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Toledo

091010

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
3
Program Path
Toledo
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Florida International

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Tim Cortazzo, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Toledo. Tim Cortazzo reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season

Toledo paired 64 primary output with 86.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2010 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 56.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Florida International

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2010 Postseason · Toledo

Games

7

Receiving Yards / G

19

Efficiency

56.9

Usage

9.4

Consistency

47.3

Best Game by takeover score

Florida International

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Game-by-Game Trend

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 55. Arizona: -3. Kent State: 16. Ball State: 22. Eastern Michigan: 4. Bowling Green: 35. Central Michigan: 4

Volume vs Efficiency

Low volume / high quality

High volume / high quality

Low volume / lower quality

High volume / lower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 4 by 91.7. Arizona: 1 by 0. Kent State: 2 by 53.3. Ball State: 1 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 26.7. Bowling Green: 1 by 100. Central Michigan: 1 by 26.7

Split Comparison

Wins16.2 · n=5 · -9.8 vs Losses
Losses26 · n=2 · +9.8 vs Wins
First Half22.5 · n=4 · +8.2 vs Second Half
Second Half14.3 · n=3 · -8.2 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

7 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Florida International

Best efficiency game

100 vs Bowling Green

Result
Mon 12/27vs Florida InternationalL 32-3445513.813.80025
Fri 11/26vs Central MichiganW 42-31144404
Thu 11/18vs Bowling GreenW 33-141353535135
Sat 10/30@ Eastern MichiganW 42-7144404
Sat 10/23vs Ball StateW 31-241222222022
Sat 10/16vs Kent StateW 34-212168809
Sat 9/4vs ArizonaL 2-411-3-3-30-3

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Toledo

    2009-2010

    Opening stop

Season Progression

200920102010
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2009 Regular SeasonToledo6486.74.9
2010 PostseasonToledo13356.99.469
2010 Regular SeasonToledo13356.99.40

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Florida International

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

55

Primary metric

55 receiving yards with a 91.7 efficiency score.

#2

Ohio State

29

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

29 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Northern Illinois

26

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

26 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Bowling Green

35

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

35 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Ball State

22

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2009 Regular Season · Toledo

64 primary output · 86.7 efficiency · 4.9 usage

61.7

#2

2010 Postseason · Toledo

53.4

133 primary · 56.9 efficiency · 9.4 usage

#3

2010 Regular Season · Toledo

53.4

133 primary · 56.9 efficiency · 9.4 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

2★

Class 2007 · Rating 0.7922

Penn Trafford · Harrison City, PA

Committed To
Toledo
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2007

Career Facts

1

Career teams

3

Seasons tracked

197

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.

Quick Answers

Tim Cortazzo quick answers

Recruiting profile

2-star recruit

Position
WR
Teams played for
1
Seasons tracked
3
Career receiving yards
197