Player Stats

Jermaine Robertson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
668
Rushing yards
645
Receiving yards
23
Touchdowns
9

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2008 Regular SeasonArkansas State246460041
2009 Regular SeasonArkansas State451510128.9
2010 Regular SeasonArkansas State1136834820552.8
2011 PostseasonArkansas State1118180034.5
2011 Regular SeasonArkansas State111851823334.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season

Arkansas State paired 368 primary output with 42.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2011 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 31.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee

Win with 85 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2011 Postseason · Arkansas State

Games

11

Scrimmage Yards / G

18.5

Efficiency

31.3

Usage

6.4

Consistency

33.2

Best Game by takeover score

Middle Tennessee

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Northern Illinois: 18. Illinois: 15. Memphis: 37. Virginia Tech: 3. Central Arkansas: 33. Western Kentucky: 1. UL Monroe: -3. Florida International: -1. North Texas: 10. Louisiana: 5. Middle Tennessee: 85

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Illinois: 3 by 62.5. Illinois: 5 by 31.3. Memphis: 10 by 36.9. Virginia Tech: 1 by 31.3. Central Arkansas: 6 by 57.3. Western Kentucky: 2 by 5.2. UL Monroe: 1 by 0. Florida International: 1 by 0. North Texas: 3 by 34.7. Louisiana: 3 by 17.4. Middle Tennessee: 13 by 68.1

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins20.9 · Games = 8 · +8.9 vs Losses
Losses12 · Games = 3 · -8.9 vs Wins