Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Northern Illinois paired 695 primary output with 82.9 efficiency.
Player Stats
Nathan Palmer College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Receiving yards
- 1,575
- Receptions
- 93
- Touchdowns
- 17
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | Northern Illinois | 5 | - | 0 | 0 | 50.3 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 5 | 12 | 278 | 2 | 50.3 |
| 2009 Postseason | Northern Illinois | 7 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 38 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 7 | 4 | 58 | 2 | 38 |
| 2010 Postseason | Northern Illinois | 14 | 2 | 40 | 0 | 67.9 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 14 | 27 | 492 | 6 | 67.9 |
| 2011 Postseason | Northern Illinois | 13 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 72.9 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 13 | 46 | 683 | 7 | 72.9 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Northern Illinois
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
53.5
Efficiency
82.9
Usage
19.5
Consistency
43.5
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas State: 12. Army: 19. Kansas: 86. Wisconsin: 23. Cal Poly: 27. Central Michigan: 12. Kent State: 35. Western Michigan: 89. Buffalo: 38. Toledo: 120. Bowling Green: 24. Ball State: 95. Ohio: 115
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas State: 1 by 80. Army: 1 by 100. Kansas: 9 by 63.7. Wisconsin: 2 by 76.7. Cal Poly: 3 by 60. Central Michigan: 1 by 80. Kent State: 2 by 100. Western Michigan: 7 by 84.8. Buffalo: 2 by 100. Toledo: 4 by 100. Bowling Green: 3 by 53.3. Ball State: 8 by 79.2. Ohio: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins57.4 · Games = 10 · +17.1 vs Losses
Losses40.3 · Games = 3 · -17.1 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Nathan Palmer
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.