Player Stats

Willie Clark College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,123
Receptions
83
Touchdowns
11

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2008 Regular SeasonNorthern Illinois4679043.3
2009 Regular SeasonNorthern Illinois919220155.2
2010 PostseasonNorthern Illinois13488082.5
2010 Regular SeasonNorthern Illinois1338514782.5
2011 Regular SeasonNorthern Illinois1016222340.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason

Northern Illinois paired 602 primary output with 85.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2011 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 62.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2011 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2011 Regular Season · Northern Illinois

Games

10

Receiving Yards / G

22.2

Efficiency

62.9

Usage

10.6

Consistency

27.3

Best Game by takeover score

Bowling Green

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Army: 0. Kansas: 35. Wisconsin: 2. Cal Poly: 17. Kent State: 8. Western Michigan: 6. Toledo: 15. Bowling Green: 109. Ball State: 30. Ohio: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas: 2 by 100. Wisconsin: 1 by 13.3. Cal Poly: 2 by 56.7. Kent State: 2 by 26.7. Western Michigan: 1 by 40. Toledo: 1 by 100. Bowling Green: 4 by 100. Ball State: 3 by 66.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins23.1 · Games = 8 · +4.6 vs Losses
Losses18.5 · Games = 2 · -4.6 vs Wins