Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
UConn paired 1,257 primary output with 56.6 efficiency.
Player Stats
Cody Endres College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Total offense
- 2,115
- Passing yards
- 2,236
- Touchdowns
- 11
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | UConn | 3 | 386 | 411 | -25 | 0 | 40.3 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UConn | 7 | 1,257 | 1,354 | -97 | 6 | 58.4 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UConn | 3 | 472 | 471 | 1 | 5 | 49.6 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 59.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Loss with 153 yards of offense and 58.6 efficiency. It landed in the 66.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · UConn
Games
3
Primary Metric / G
157.3
Efficiency
59.5
Usage
2.6
Consistency
95.6
Best Game by takeover score
Rutgers
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Buffalo: 140. Vanderbilt: 179. Rutgers: 153
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Buffalo: 12 by 68.4. Vanderbilt: 31 by 51.6. Rutgers: 34 by 58.6
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins159.5 · Games = 2 · +6.5 vs Losses
Losses153 · Games = 1 · -6.5 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Cody Endres
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.