Player Stats

Charles Opeseyitan College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
613
Rushing yards
573
Receiving yards
40
Touchdowns
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2008 Regular SeasonTulsa83633558264.3
2009 Regular SeasonTulsa825021832249.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season

Tulsa paired 363 primary output with 72.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 57.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2009 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico

Win with 72 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Regular Season · Tulsa

Games

8

Scrimmage Yards / G

31.3

Efficiency

57.3

Usage

9.7

Consistency

42.3

Best Game by takeover score

New Mexico

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Tulane: 15. New Mexico: 72. Sam Houston: 55. Rice: 49. Boise State: 8. SMU: 13. Houston: 19. East Carolina: 19

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulane: 2 by 78.1. New Mexico: 10 by 57.8. Sam Houston: 10 by 57.3. Rice: 10 by 51. Boise State: 2 by 41.7. SMU: 1 by 100. Houston: 6 by 33. East Carolina: 5 by 39.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins47.8 · Games = 4 · +33 vs Losses
Losses14.8 · Games = 4 · -33 vs Wins