Usage Score
9.5
Player Dossier
2007-2010Tulsa
RB • 6'3" • Little Rock, AR, USA
Charles Clay leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 66.5 efficiency.
Usage Score
9.5
Efficiency
66.5
Consistency
51
Season Value
47.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason · Tulsa
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Charles Clay, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason · Tulsa. Charles Clay leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 66.5 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason
Tulsa paired 1,328 primary output with 73.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 66.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Win with 108 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
57.8
Efficiency
66.5
Usage
9.5
Consistency
51
Best Game by takeover score
Hawai'i
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Hawai'i: 100. East Carolina: 86. Bowling Green: 108. Oklahoma State: 18. Unknown: 39. Memphis: 34. SMU: 30. Tulane: 96. Notre Dame: 6. Rice: 28. Houston: 75. UTEP: 99. Southern Miss: 33
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Hawai'i: 6 by 100. East Carolina: 8 by 89.6. Bowling Green: 8 by 100. Oklahoma State: 4 by 46.9. Unknown: 3 by 68.8. Memphis: 7 by 26.5. SMU: 5 by 31.3. Tulane: 7 by 70.8. Notre Dame: 1 by 50. Rice: 3 by 38.9. Houston: 11 by 67.2. UTEP: 12 by 74. Southern Miss: 2 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Best efficiency game
100 vs Hawai'i
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/25 | vs Hawai'i | W 62-35 | 4 | 62 | 15.50 | 0 | 2 | 38 | 16.7 |
| Fri 11/26 | vs Southern Miss | W 56-50 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 33 | 16.5 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs UTEP | W 31-28 | 9 | 57 | 6.30 | 0 | 3 | 42 | 8.3 |
| Sun 11/14 | @ Houston | W 28-25 | 5 | 31 | 6.20 | 0 | 6 | 44 | 6.8 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Rice | W 64-27 | 1 | -5 | -5 | 0 | 2 | 33 | 9.3 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Notre Dame | W 28-27 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Tulane2+ TD | W 52-24 | 3 | 10 | 3.30 | 0 | 4 | 86 | 13.7 |
| Sun 10/10 | @ SMU | L 18-21 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 29 | 6 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Memphis | W 48-7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 32 | 4.9 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 36 | 13 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Oklahoma State | L 28-65 | 4 | 18 | 4.50 | 0 | — | — | 4.5 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Bowling Green | W 33-20 | 4 | 47 | 11.80 | 0 | 4 | 61 | 13.5 |
| Sun 9/5 | @ East Carolina | L 49-51 | — | — | — | — | 8 | 86 | 10.8 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulsa
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Postseason | Tulsa | 1,328 | 73.4 | 14 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Tulsa | 1,328 | 73.4 | 14 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Tulsa | 609 | 54.8 | 8.1 | -719 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Tulsa | 609 | 54.8 | 8.1 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Tulsa | 766 | 53.1 | 14.2 | 157 |
| 2010 Postseason | Tulsa | 752 | 66.5 | 9.5 | -14 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Tulsa | 752 | 66.5 | 9.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Arkansas
Loss with 148 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
148
Primary metric
148 scrimmage yards and 14.1 usage.
#2
Bowling Green
108
Primary metric
Win with 108 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
108 scrimmage yards and 12.1 usage.
#3
Hawai'i
100
Primary metric
Win with 100 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
100 scrimmage yards and 12.8 usage.
#4
UAB
132
Primary metric
Win with 132 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
132 scrimmage yards and 13.8 usage.
#5
UTEP
158
Primary metric
Loss with 158 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
158 scrimmage yards and 35.1 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2007 Postseason · Tulsa
1,328 primary output · 73.4 efficiency · 14 usage
67.3
#2
2007 Regular Season · Tulsa
67.3
1,328 primary · 73.4 efficiency · 14 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Tulsa
47.2
752 primary · 66.5 efficiency · 9.5 usage
14
100+ rush yards
2
150+ scrimmage yards
8
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2007 · Rating 0.8333
Little Rock Central · Little Rock, AR
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
3,455
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 51 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Charles Clay quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit