Usage / Role
1%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2009-2011Ohio
TE • 6'3" • Grove City, OH, USA
Zac Clark reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
1%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
11
Developing production for a tight end
Reliability
13
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
18
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Ohio
Snapshot
Zac Clark, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Ohio. Zac Clark reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2010 Regular Season | Ohio | 2 | 2 | 30 | 0 | 66.7 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Ohio | 2 | 2 | 27 | 0 | 72.1 |
Related Context
Zac Clark played TE for Ohio. Across 3 tracked seasons, Zac Clark recorded 57 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Ohio.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Ohio paired 27 primary output with 86.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 86.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2011 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
2
Receiving Yards / G
13.5
Efficiency
86.7
Usage
5.4
Consistency
93.8
Best Game by takeover score
Marshall
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Gardner-Webb: 11. Marshall: 16
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Marshall
Best efficiency game
100 vs Marshall
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Ohio | 30 | 76.7 | 6.7 | 30 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Ohio | 27 | 86.7 | 5.4 | -3 |
#1 Featured game
vs Akron
Week 7 · W 38-10 · Conference game
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
22
Receiving Yards
73.7 takeover
22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
vs Marshall
Week 3 · W 44-7
16
Receiving Yards
72 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
vs Gardner-Webb
Week 2 · W 30-3
11
Receiving Yards
53.9 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#4
@ Kent State
Week 13 · L 6-28 · Conference game
8
Receiving Yards
37.8 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Regular Season · Ohio
27 primary output · 86.7 efficiency · 5.4 usage
72.1
#2
2010 Regular Season · Ohio
66.7
30 primary · 76.7 efficiency · 6.7 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Ohio
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.