Usage Score
26.7
Player Dossier
2007-2010TCU
Jeremy Kerley
WR • 5'10" • Hutto, TX, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Jeremy Kerley reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
66.4
Consistency
63.4
Season Value
60.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · TCU
0707080809091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- TCU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeremy Kerley, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · TCU. Jeremy Kerley reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
TCU paired 532 primary output with 76.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 66.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UNLV
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · TCU
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
44.2
Efficiency
66.4
Usage
26.7
Consistency
63.4
Best Game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 58. Oregon State: 49. Unknown: 16. Baylor: 69. SMU: 33. Colorado State: 5. Wyoming: 65. BYU: 25. Air Force: 20. UNLV: 82. Utah: 68. San Diego State: 85. New Mexico: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 6 by 64.4. Oregon State: 6 by 54.4. Unknown: 1 by 100. Baylor: 6 by 76.7. SMU: 4 by 55. Colorado State: 3 by 11.1. Wyoming: 3 by 100. BYU: 5 by 33.3. Air Force: 2 by 66.7. UNLV: 5 by 100. Utah: 7 by 64.8. San Diego State: 8 by 70.8
Split Comparison
Wins46.6 · n=12
First Half42.1 · n=7 · -4.5 vs Second Half
Second Half46.7 · n=6 · +4.5 vs First Half
All Games44.2 · n=13
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UNLV
Best efficiency game
100 vs UNLV
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/1 | vs Wisconsin | W 21-19 | — | 6 | 58 | 7.9 | 9.70 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/27 | @ New Mexico | W 66-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | vs San Diego StateHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 40-35 | — | 8 | 85 | 9.2 | 10.60 | 3 | 38 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Utah | W 47-7 | — | 7 | 68 | 7.9 | 9.70 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 10/31 | @ UNLV | W 48-6 | — | 5 | 82 | 14.5 | 16.40 | 1 | 27 |
| Sun 10/24 | vs Air Force | W 38-7 | — | 2 | 20 | 7.8 | 10 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs BYU | W 31-3 | — | 5 | 25 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Wyoming | W 45-0 | — | 3 | 65 | 17 | 21.70 | 1 | 50 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Colorado State | W 27-0 | — | 3 | 5 | 3.6 | 1.70 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ SMU | W 41-24 | — | 4 | 33 | 7.8 | 8.30 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Baylor2+ TD | W 45-10 | — | 6 | 69 | 11.8 | 11.50 | 2 | 28 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 16 | 10.5 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Oregon State | W 30-21 | — | 6 | 49 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 1 | 19 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
TCU
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
20072007200820082009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Postseason | TCU | 97 | 60 | 6.4 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | TCU | 97 | 60 | 6.4 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | TCU | 95 | 56.2 | 10.4 | -2 |
| 2008 Regular Season | TCU | 95 | 56.2 | 10.4 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | TCU | 532 | 76.6 | 24.2 | 437 |
| 2009 Regular Season | TCU | 532 | 76.6 | 24.2 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | TCU | 575 | 66.4 | 26.7 | 43 |
| 2010 Regular Season | TCU | 575 | 66.4 | 26.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Wyoming
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
87
Primary metric
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UNLV
82
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
San Diego State
85
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 70.8 efficiency score.
#4
San Diego State
48
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Wyoming
65
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · TCU
532 primary output · 76.6 efficiency · 24.2 usage
63.1
#2
2009 Regular Season · TCU
63.1
532 primary · 76.6 efficiency · 24.2 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · TCU
60.9
575 primary · 66.4 efficiency · 26.7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.7963
Lutheran North · St. Louis, MO
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,299
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.