Usage Score
10
Player Dossier
2008-2011Purdue
Waynelle Gravesande
WR • 6'0" • Irvington, NJ, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Waynelle Gravesande reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
57.5
Consistency
33.1
Season Value
49.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Purdue
08091011
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Waynelle Gravesande, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Purdue. Waynelle Gravesande reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Waynelle Gravesande played WR for Purdue. Across 4 tracked seasons, Waynelle Gravesande recorded 4 rushing yards and 201 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Purdue.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Purdue paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 57.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2011 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · Purdue
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
14.8
Efficiency
57.5
Usage
10
Consistency
33.1
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Middle Tennessee: 23. Rice: 0. Unknown: 57. Notre Dame: 22. Minnesota: 5. Penn State: 26. Illinois: 0. Michigan: 4. Wisconsin: 8. Ohio State: 9. Iowa: 17. Indiana: 6
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 76.7. Unknown: 4 by 95. Notre Dame: 2 by 73.3. Minnesota: 1 by 33.3. Penn State: 2 by 86.7. Michigan: 1 by 26.7. Wisconsin: 2 by 26.7. Ohio State: 1 by 60. Iowa: 2 by 56.7. Indiana: 1 by 40
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins8.6 · Games = 5 · -4.2 vs Losses
Losses12.8 · Games = 6 · +4.2 vs Wins
First Half22.2 · Games = 6 · +14.8 vs Second Half
Second Half7.3 · Games = 6 · -14.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
95 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ Indiana | W 33-25 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Iowa | L 21-31 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Ohio State | W 26-23 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Wisconsin | L 17-62 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Michigan | L 14-36 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Illinois | W 21-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Penn State | L 18-23 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Minnesota | W 45-17 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 10/2 | vs Notre Dame | L 10-38 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 57 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Rice | L 22-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 27-24 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 14 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
2008200920102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Purdue | 13 | 43.3 | 4.9 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Purdue | 11 | 73.3 | 3.2 | -2 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | -11 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Purdue | 177 | 57.5 | 10 | 177 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
57
Primary metric
57 receiving yards with a 95 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio State
11
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#3
Indiana
13
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
13 receiving yards with a 43.3 efficiency score.
#4
Penn State
26
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#5
Middle Tennessee
23
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 76.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Purdue
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2011 Regular Season · Purdue
49.5
177 primary · 57.5 efficiency · 10 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Purdue
38.8
13 primary · 43.3 efficiency · 4.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.8267
Irvington · Irvington, NJ
- Committed To
- Purdue
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
201
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.