Usage Score
8.7
Player Dossier
2009-2011Alabama
Chris Underwood
TE • 6'4" • Vestavia Hills, AL, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Chris Underwood reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
40
Consistency
50
Season Value
32.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Alabama
0910101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Alabama
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Underwood, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Alabama. Chris Underwood reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Alabama paired 36 primary output with 51.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 40 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Alabama
Games
2
Receiving Yards / G
6
Efficiency
40
Usage
8.7
Consistency
50
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.
Game-by-Game Trend
12
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 12. Tennessee: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Wins6 · n=2
All Games6 · n=2
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
LSU
Best efficiency game
40 vs LSU
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Alabama | 36 | 51.1 | 5.5 | 36 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Alabama | 36 | 51.1 | 5.5 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Alabama | 12 | 40 | 8.7 | -24 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Alabama | 12 | 40 | 8.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Duke
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
28
Primary metric
28 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
LSU
12
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
7
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
7 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan State
1
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
1 receiving yards with a 6.7 efficiency score.
#5
Tennessee
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Alabama
36 primary output · 51.1 efficiency · 5.5 usage
46.4
#2
2010 Regular Season · Alabama
46.4
36 primary · 51.1 efficiency · 5.5 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Alabama
32.8
12 primary · 40 efficiency · 8.7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.7889
Vestavia Hills · Birmingham, AL
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
48
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 5 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.