Usage / Role
11%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2009-2011UTEP
RB • 5'11" • Sweetwater, TX, USA
Joe Banyard leans balanced backfield option traits and 55.2 efficiency.
Usage / Role
11%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
6
Developing production for a back
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
14
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Player Story
Joe Banyard built his college career from 2009 through 2011 as a running back from Sweetwater, TX wearing No. 21, spending time with UTEP. The clearest part of Joe Banyard's career was his backfield work: 1,455...
Read the storyJoe Banyard, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · UTEP. Joe Banyard leans balanced backfield option traits and 55.2 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2010 Postseason | UTEP | 13 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 61.2 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UTEP | 13 | 719 | 612 | 107 | 8 | 61.2 |
| 2011 Regular Season | UTEP | 12 | 899 | 832 | 67 | 6 | 62.7 |
Related Context
Joe Banyard played RB for UTEP. Across 3 tracked seasons, Joe Banyard recorded 1,455 rushing yards, 174 receiving yards, and 14 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2011 with UTEP.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
UTEP paired 899 primary output with 55.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 57.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
56.2
Efficiency
57.3
Usage
19.4
Consistency
50.8
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. BYU: 11. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 114. Houston: 61. New Mexico State: 64. Memphis: 45. New Mexico: 116. Rice: 14. UAB: 15. Tulane: 36. Marshall: 10. SMU: 17. Arkansas: 69. Tulsa: 158
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 2 by 57.3. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 21 by 53.5. Houston: 14 by 41.3. New Mexico State: 11 by 60.6. Memphis: 9 by 52.1. New Mexico: 17 by 65.9. Rice: 3 by 48.6. UAB: 3 by 52.1. Tulane: 4 by 87.5. Marshall: 2 by 52.1. SMU: 4 by 44.8. Arkansas: 15 by 49.6. Tulsa: 21 by 79.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
87.5 vs Tulane
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/18 | vs BYU | L 24-52 | 2 | 11 | 5.50 | 0 | — | — | 5.5 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Tulsa100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 28-31 | 20 | 155 | 7.80 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7.5 |
| Sun 11/14 | @ Arkansas | L 21-58 | 8 | 39 | 4.90 | 0 | 7 | 30 | 4.6 |
| Sun 11/7 | vs SMU | W 28-14 | 3 | 13 | 4.30 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4.3 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Marshall | L 12-16 | 2 | 10 | 5 | 0 | — | — | 5 |
| Sun 10/24 | vs Tulane | L 24-34 | 4 | 36 | 9 | 0 | — | — | 9 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ UAB | L 6-21 | 3 | 15 | 5 | 0 | — | — | 5 |
| Sun 10/10 | vs Rice | W 44-24 | 3 | 14 | 4.70 | 0 | — | — | 4.7 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ New Mexico | W 38-20 | 15 | 90 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 26 | 6.8 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs Memphis | W 16-13 | 9 | 45 | 5 | 1 | — | — | 5 |
| Sun 9/19 | vs New Mexico State | W 42-10 | 11 | 64 | 5.80 | 1 | — | — | 5.8 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Houston | L 24-54 | 10 | 37 | 3.70 | 0 | 4 | 24 | 4.4 |
| Sun 9/5 | vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff2+ TD | W 31-10 | 19 | 94 | 4.90 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 5.4 |
Player Story
Joe Banyard built his college career from 2009 through 2011 as a running back from Sweetwater, TX wearing No. 21, spending time with UTEP. The clearest part of Joe Banyard's career was his backfield work: 1,455 rushing yards, 236 carries, 14 rushing touchdowns, and 174 receiving yards across 25 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2010 with UTEP. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 174 receiving yards and 147 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 25 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across UTEP.
The arc is straightforward: Joe Banyard moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Postseason | UTEP | 730 | 57.3 | 19.4 | 730 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UTEP | 730 | 57.3 | 19.4 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | UTEP | 899 | 55.2 | 21 | 169 |
#1 Featured game
vs Houston
Week 5 · L 42-49 · Conference game
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
256
Scrimmage Yards
98.1 takeover
256 scrimmage yards and 40 usage.
#2
@ Tulsa
Week 12 · L 28-31 · Conference game
158
Scrimmage Yards
93.3 takeover
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
158 scrimmage yards and 42.9 usage.
#3
vs East Carolina
Week 11 · W 22-17 · Conference game
161
Scrimmage Yards
78.6 takeover
Win with 161 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
161 scrimmage yards and 31.7 usage.
#4
vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff
Week 1 · W 31-10
114
Scrimmage Yards
75.2 takeover
Win with 114 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
114 scrimmage yards and 36.8 usage.
#5
@ New Mexico
Week 5 · W 38-20
116
Scrimmage Yards
74.3 takeover
Win with 116 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
116 scrimmage yards and 29.3 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Regular Season · UTEP
899 primary output · 55.2 efficiency · 21 usage
62.7
#2
2010 Postseason · UTEP
61.2
730 primary · 57.3 efficiency · 19.4 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · UTEP
61.2
730 primary · 57.3 efficiency · 19.4 usage
3
100+ rush yards
3
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.