Usage Score
25.9
Player Dossier
2008-2011Alabama
WR • 5'10" • Birmingham, AL, USA
Marquis Maze reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
25.9
Efficiency
68.9
Consistency
54.8
Season Value
62.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Alabama
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Marquis Maze, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Alabama. Marquis Maze reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Marquis Maze played WR for Alabama. Across 4 tracked seasons, Marquis Maze recorded 19 passing yards, 17 rushing yards, and 1,844 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Alabama.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Alabama paired 523 primary output with 84.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 68.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
48.2
Efficiency
68.9
Usage
25.9
Consistency
54.8
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 0. Kent State: 118. Penn State: 42. North Texas: 26. Arkansas: 40. Florida: 36. Vanderbilt: 93. Ole Miss: 21. Tennessee: 106. LSU: 61. Mississippi State: 22. Unknown: 44. Auburn: 18
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kent State: 8 by 98.3. Penn State: 4 by 70. North Texas: 3 by 57.8. Arkansas: 5 by 53.3. Florida: 2 by 100. Vanderbilt: 9 by 68.9. Ole Miss: 3 by 46.7. Tennessee: 5 by 100. LSU: 6 by 67.8. Mississippi State: 4 by 36.7. Unknown: 3 by 97.8. Auburn: 4 by 30
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kent State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/10 | @ LSU | W 21-0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Auburn | W 42-14 | — | 4 | 18 | 3.8 | 4.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Mississippi State | W 24-7 | — | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 11/6 | vs LSU | L 6-9 | — | 6 | 61 | 7.9 | 10.20 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Tennessee100 receiving yards | W 37-6 | — | 5 | 106 | 17.5 | 21.20 | 0 | 69 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Ole Miss | W 52-7 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs VanderbiltHigh volume | W 34-0 | — | 9 | 93 | 9.2 | 10.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 10/2 | @ Florida | W 38-10 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Arkansas | W 38-14 | — | 5 | 40 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs North Texas | W 41-0 | — | 3 | 26 | 8 | 8.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Penn State | W 27-11 | — | 4 | 42 | 7.4 | 10.50 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Kent State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 48-7 | — | 8 | 118 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 1 | 26 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Alabama
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Alabama | 137 | 72.8 | 13.5 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Alabama | 523 | 84.1 | 21.5 | 386 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Alabama | 523 | 84.1 | 21.5 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Alabama | 557 | 85.6 | 15.4 | 34 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Alabama | 557 | 85.6 | 15.4 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Alabama | 627 | 68.9 | 25.9 | 70 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Alabama | 627 | 68.9 | 25.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Florida
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96
Primary metric
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kent State
118
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 98.3 efficiency score.
#3
Mississippi State
89
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
LSU
88
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#5
Tennessee
106
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Alabama
523 primary output · 84.1 efficiency · 21.5 usage
63.7
#2
2009 Regular Season · Alabama
63.7
523 primary · 84.1 efficiency · 21.5 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Alabama
62.4
557 primary · 85.6 efficiency · 15.4 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.79
Morton Ranch · Katy, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,844
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.