Player Stats

Troy Pollard College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
893
Rushing yards
836
Receiving yards
57
Touchdowns
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2007 Regular SeasonIllinois315814810048
2008 Regular SeasonIllinois5473710125.1
2009 Regular SeasonIllinois976679020.2
2010 Regular SeasonIllinois101141095023.9
2011 PostseasonIllinois13913-4054.4
2011 Regular SeasonIllinois1348946227254.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason

Illinois paired 498 primary output with 55.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2011 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 55.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan

Win with 133 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2011 Postseason · Illinois

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

38.3

Efficiency

55.3

Usage

9.4

Consistency

35.4

Best Game by takeover score

Western Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UCLA: 9. Arkansas State: 23. South Dakota State: 101. Arizona State: 3. Western Michigan: 133. Northwestern: 9. Indiana: 92. Ohio State: 32. Purdue: 5. Penn State: 2. Michigan: 17. Wisconsin: 39. Minnesota: 33

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCLA: 5 by 27.8. Arkansas State: 2 by 97.9. South Dakota State: 8 by 100. Arizona State: 1 by 31.3. Western Michigan: 14 by 89.6. Northwestern: 3 by 31.3. Indiana: 9 by 92.6. Ohio State: 7 by 49. Purdue: 2 by 29.2. Penn State: 5 by 4.2. Michigan: 6 by 25.6. Wisconsin: 5 by 82.5. Minnesota: 6 by 57.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins52.9 · Games = 7 · +31.5 vs Losses
Losses21.3 · Games = 6 · -31.5 vs Wins