Usage Score
27.7
Player Profile
Chris Relf
QB • 6'4" • Montgomery, AL, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Chris Relf is a balanced quarterback profile with 27.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
55.3
Consistency
59.5
Season Value
53.6
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Mississippi State
080910101111
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Primary stop by seasons
- Mississippi State
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Mississippi State
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Chris Relf, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Mississippi State. Chris Relf is a balanced quarterback profile with 27.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Mississippi State paired 2,502 primary output with 60.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 55.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Mississippi State
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
144.3
Efficiency
55.3
Usage
27.7
Consistency
59.5
Best Game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 193. Memphis: 253. Auburn: 301. LSU: 106. Louisiana Tech: 184. Georgia: 188. UAB: 58. Kentucky: 105. Unknown: 83. Alabama: -3. Ole Miss: 119
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wake Forest: 34 by 55.1. Memphis: 34 by 70.3. Auburn: 60 by 59.2. LSU: 33 by 48.6. Louisiana Tech: 38 by 51. Georgia: 46 by 49.6. UAB: 15 by 55.6. Kentucky: 15 by 57.3. Unknown: 10 by 80.8. Alabama: 5 by 25. Ole Miss: 23 by 56.2
Split Comparison
Wins152 · n=6 · +4 vs Losses
Losses148 · n=4 · -4 vs Wins
First Half204.2 · n=6 · +131.8 vs Second Half
Second Half72.4 · n=5 · -131.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Auburn
Best efficiency game
80.8 vs Unknown
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/30 | @ Wake ForestDual-threat | W 23-17 | 12 | 19 | 129 | 63.2 | 1 | 2 | 55.1 | 15 | 64 | 4.30 | 0 | 27 |
| Sun 11/27 | vs Ole Miss | W 31-3 | 8 | 13 | 70 | 61.5 | 2 | 1 | 56.2 | 10 | 49 | 4.90 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 11/13 | vs Alabama | L 7-24 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 3 | -3 | -1 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 6 | 61 | 83.3 | 2 | 0 | 80.8 | 4 | 22 | 5.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Kentucky3+ TD | W 28-16 | 6 | 9 | 92 | 66.7 | 1 | 1 | 57.3 | 6 | 13 | 2.20 | 2 | 12 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ UAB | W 21-3 | 6 | 10 | 46 | 60.0 | 0 | 0 | 55.6 | 5 | 12 | 2.40 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Georgia | L 10-24 | 19 | 31 | 157 | 61.3 | 0 | 2 | 49.6 | 15 | 31 | 2.10 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 26-20 | 14 | 29 | 164 | 48.3 | 1 | 1 | 51 | 9 | 20 | 2.20 | 0 | 6 |
| Fri 9/16 | vs LSU | L 6-19 | 11 | 17 | 96 | 64.7 | 0 | 1 | 48.6 | 16 | 10 | 0.60 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ AuburnDual-threat | L 34-41 | 20 | 33 | 195 | 60.6 | 1 | 1 | 59.2 | 27 | 106 | 3.90 | 0 | 17 |
| Fri 9/2 | @ MemphisDual-threat | W 59-14 | 13 | 21 | 202 | 61.9 | 2 | 0 | 70.3 | 13 | 51 | 3.90 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Mississippi State
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
200820092010201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | 34.8 | 12.2 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 783 | 60.5 | 16.8 | 783 |
| 2010 Postseason | Mississippi State | 2,502 | 60.4 | 31.5 | 1,719 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 2,502 | 60.4 | 31.5 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Mississippi State | 1,587 | 55.3 | 27.7 | -915 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 1,587 | 55.3 | 27.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ole Miss
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
174
Primary metric
174 total offense with 79.8 efficiency.
#2
Auburn
301
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
301 total offense with 59.2 efficiency.
#3
Arkansas
327
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
327 total offense with 65.5 efficiency.
#4
Georgia
257
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
257 total offense with 76.7 efficiency.
#5
Ole Miss
354
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
354 total offense with 75 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Mississippi State
2,502 primary output · 60.4 efficiency · 31.5 usage
63.8
#2
2010 Regular Season · Mississippi State
63.8
2,502 primary · 60.4 efficiency · 31.5 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Mississippi State
53.6
1,587 primary · 55.3 efficiency · 27.7 usage
Milestones
6
250+ passing yards
4
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
15
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.8089
Carver · Montgomery, AL
- Committed To
- Mississippi State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
4,872
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.