Usage / Role
16%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2007-2010Stanford
FB • 6'1" • Tigard, OR, USA
Owen Marecic leans balanced backfield option traits and 35.1 efficiency.
Usage / Role
16%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
36
Developing production for a back
Reliability
70
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
36
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Stanford
Snapshot
Player Story
Owen Marecic built his college career from 2007 through 2010 as a FB from Tigard, OR wearing No. 48, spending time with Stanford. The clearest part of Owen Marecic's career was his backfield work: 67 rushing yards,...
Read the storyNFL Draft
Owen Marecic, FB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Stanford. Owen Marecic leans balanced backfield option traits and 35.1 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Stanford | 5 | 32 | 6 | 26 | 0 | 33.5 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Stanford | 4 | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 33.6 |
| 2009 Postseason | Stanford | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 51.5 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Stanford | 9 | 146 | 14 | 132 | 4 | 51.5 |
| 2010 Postseason | Stanford | 13 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 42.8 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Stanford | 13 | 117 | 42 | 75 | 5 | 42.8 |
Related Context
Owen Marecic played FB for Stanford. Across 4 tracked seasons, Owen Marecic recorded 67 rushing yards, 258 receiving yards, and 11 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Stanford.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Stanford paired 147 primary output with 60 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 35.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington
Win with 27 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
9.3
Efficiency
35.1
Usage
4
Consistency
42.5
Best Game by takeover score
Washington
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Virginia Tech: 4. Sacramento State: 6. UCLA: 5. Wake Forest: 6. Notre Dame: 7. Oregon: 10. USC: 5. Washington State: 20. Washington: 27. Arizona: 12. Arizona State: 14. California: 2. Oregon State: 3
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Virginia Tech: 3 by 13.9. Sacramento State: 1 by 62.5. UCLA: 3 by 17.4. Wake Forest: 2 by 31.3. Notre Dame: 4 by 13.5. Oregon: 3 by 32.6. USC: 1 by 41.7. Washington State: 4 by 36.5. Washington: 2 by 100. Arizona: 2 by 37.5. Arizona State: 5 by 17.9. California: 1 by 20.8. Oregon State: 1 by 31.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Washington
Best efficiency game
100 vs Washington
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/4 | @ Virginia Tech | W 40-12 | 3 | 4 | 1.30 | 1 | — | — | 1.3 |
| Sun 11/28 | vs Oregon State | W 38-0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ California | W 48-14 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | — | — | 2 |
| Sun 11/14 | @ Arizona State2+ TD | W 17-13 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 2.8 |
| Sun 11/7 | vs Arizona | W 42-17 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 6 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Washington | W 41-0 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Washington State | W 38-28 | 2 | 5 | 2.50 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 5 |
| Sun 10/10 | vs USC | W 37-35 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Sun 10/3 | @ Oregon | L 31-52 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3.3 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Notre Dame | W 37-14 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1.8 |
| Sun 9/19 | vs Wake Forest | W 68-24 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sun 9/12 | @ UCLA | W 35-0 | 3 | 5 | 1.70 | 1 | — | — | 1.7 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Sacramento State | W 52-17 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | — | — | 6 |
Player Story
Owen Marecic built his college career from 2007 through 2010 as a FB from Tigard, OR wearing No. 48, spending time with Stanford. The clearest part of Owen Marecic's career was his backfield work: 67 rushing yards, 36 carries, 9 rushing touchdowns, and 258 receiving yards across 31 career games in the available record. His career also includes 258 receiving yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Owen Marecic's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Stanford
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Stanford | 32 | 36.9 | 3.9 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Stanford | 25 | 52.1 | 2.1 | -7 |
| 2009 Postseason | Stanford | 147 | 60 | 3.1 | 122 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Stanford | 147 | 60 | 3.1 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Stanford | 121 | 35.1 | 4 | -26 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Stanford | 121 | 35.1 | 4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs San José State
Week 3 · W 42-17
Win with 48 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
48
Scrimmage Yards
70.4 takeover
48 scrimmage yards and 3.9 usage.
#2
@ Washington
Week 9 · W 41-0 · Conference game
27
Scrimmage Yards
69.5 takeover
Win with 27 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
27 scrimmage yards and 3 usage.
#3
@ TCU
Week 3 · L 14-31
12
Scrimmage Yards
69 takeover
Loss with 12 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
12 scrimmage yards and 2.5 usage.
#4
@ USC
Week 11 · W 55-21 · Conference game
32
Scrimmage Yards
56.5 takeover
Win with 32 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
32 scrimmage yards and 4.9 usage.
#5
@ Oregon State
Week 9 · L 6-23 · Conference game
13
Scrimmage Yards
51.3 takeover
Loss with 13 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
13 scrimmage yards and 9.8 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Postseason · Stanford
147 primary output · 60 efficiency · 3.1 usage
51.5
#2
2009 Regular Season · Stanford
51.5
147 primary · 60 efficiency · 3.1 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Stanford
42.8
121 primary · 35.1 efficiency · 4 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
1
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.