Player Stats

Robert Elliott College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
627
Rushing yards
540
Receiving yards
87
Touchdowns
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2008 Regular SeasonMississippi State31146153143.2
2009 Regular SeasonMississippi State112212210248.2
2010 PostseasonMississippi State1336360049.6
2010 Regular SeasonMississippi State1319918514049.6
2011 Regular SeasonMississippi State6573720030.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason

Mississippi State paired 235 primary output with 34.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2011 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 42.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2011 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Memphis

Win with 36 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2011 Regular Season · Mississippi State

Games

6

Scrimmage Yards / G

9.5

Efficiency

42.9

Usage

4.2

Consistency

43

Best Game by takeover score

Memphis

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Memphis: 36. LSU: 9. Georgia: 7. UAB: 8. UT Martin: 0. Ole Miss: -3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Memphis: 6 by 50. LSU: 1 by 87.5. Georgia: 2 by 36.5. UAB: 1 by 83.3. UT Martin: 1 by 0. Ole Miss: 3 by 0

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins10.3 · Games = 4 · +2.3 vs Losses
Losses8 · Games = 2 · -2.3 vs Wins