Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2008-2011Mississippi State
DB • 5'10" • Mason, TN, USA
Wade Bonner shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
0
Consistency
100
Season Value
50
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Mississippi State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Wade Bonner, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Mississippi State. Wade Bonner shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Wade Bonner played DB for Mississippi State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Wade Bonner recorded 10 rushing yards and 6 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2008 with Mississippi State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Mississippi State paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
2
Havoc Plays / G
0
Efficiency
0
Usage
—
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. LSU: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
LSU
Best efficiency game
0 vs LSU
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Mississippi State
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Tennessee
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0
Primary metric
0 disruption/tackle impact with 0 takeover score.
#2
Georgia Tech
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 0 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
0
Primary metric
Game with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 0 takeover score.
#4
LSU
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 0 takeover score.
#5
Unknown
0
Primary metric
Game with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 0 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · Mississippi State
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2009 Regular Season · Mississippi State
50
0 primary · 0 efficiency · — usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Mississippi State
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.78
Centerville · Centerville, IA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
0
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 5 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.