Usage Score
35.3
Player Dossier
2009-2011North Carolina
Dwight Jones
WR • 6'4" • Burlington, NC, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Dwight Jones reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.6
Consistency
83.8
Season Value
75.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · North Carolina
090910101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- North Carolina
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dwight Jones, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · North Carolina. Dwight Jones reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
North Carolina paired 1,196 primary output with 83.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 83.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · North Carolina
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
92
Efficiency
83.6
Usage
35.3
Consistency
83.8
Best Game by takeover score
Missouri
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Missouri: 77. Unknown: 116. Rutgers: 135. Virginia: 85. Georgia Tech: 85. East Carolina: 93. Louisville: 91. Miami: 82. Clemson: 16. Wake Forest: 138. NC State: 72. Virginia Tech: 105. Duke: 101
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri: 6 by 85.6. Unknown: 9 by 85.9. Rutgers: 6 by 100. Virginia: 5 by 100. Georgia Tech: 7 by 81. East Carolina: 6 by 100. Louisville: 4 by 100. Miami: 9 by 60.7. Clemson: 2 by 53.3. Wake Forest: 6 by 100. NC State: 9 by 53.3. Virginia Tech: 6 by 100. Duke: 10 by 67.3
Split Comparison
Wins107.2 · n=6 · +34.3 vs Losses
Losses72.8 · n=6 · -34.3 vs Wins
First Half97.4 · n=7 · +11.8 vs Second Half
Second Half85.7 · n=6 · -11.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Best efficiency game
100 vs Virginia Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/26 | vs Missouri | L 24-41 | — | 6 | 77 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Duke100 receiving yards · High volume | W 37-21 | — | 10 | 101 | 9.5 | 10.10 | 3 | 20 |
| Fri 11/18 | @ Virginia Tech100 receiving yards | L 21-24 | — | 6 | 105 | 16 | 17.50 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ NC StateHigh volume | L 0-13 | — | 9 | 72 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Wake Forest100 receiving yards | W 49-24 | — | 6 | 138 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Clemson | L 38-59 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs MiamiHigh volume | L 24-30 | — | 9 | 82 | 9.1 | 9.10 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Louisville | W 14-7 | — | 4 | 91 | 22.8 | 22.80 | 1 | 43 |
| Sun 10/2 | @ East Carolina2+ TD | W 35-20 | — | 6 | 93 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 2 | 47 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Georgia Tech | L 28-35 | — | 7 | 85 | 12.1 | 12.10 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Virginia | W 28-17 | — | 5 | 85 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Rutgers100 receiving yards | W 24-22 | — | 6 | 135 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 1 | 66 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 9 | 116 | 12.9 | 12.90 | 2 | 34 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
North Carolina
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
200920092010201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | North Carolina | 21 | 24.4 | 10.1 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | North Carolina | 21 | 24.4 | 10.1 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | North Carolina | 946 | 68.4 | 21.8 | 925 |
| 2010 Regular Season | North Carolina | 946 | 68.4 | 21.8 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | North Carolina | 1,196 | 83.6 | 35.3 | 250 |
| 2011 Regular Season | North Carolina | 1,196 | 83.6 | 35.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
233
Primary metric
233 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Wake Forest
138
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
138 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Rutgers
135
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Virginia
198
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
198 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Virginia Tech
105
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · North Carolina
1,196 primary output · 83.6 efficiency · 35.3 usage
75.7
#2
2011 Regular Season · North Carolina
75.7
1,196 primary · 83.6 efficiency · 35.3 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · North Carolina
52.5
946 primary · 68.4 efficiency · 21.8 usage
Milestones
9
100+ receiving yards
7
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.9866
Hugh M Cummings · Chatham, VA
- Committed To
- North Carolina
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,163
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.