Usage Score
11.6
Player Dossier
2008-2011Stanford
Coby Fleener
TE • 6'6" • Lemont, IL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Coby Fleener reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
88.5
Consistency
62.4
Season Value
65.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Stanford
08090910101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Stanford
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Washington
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Coby Fleener, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Stanford. Coby Fleener reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Stanford paired 667 primary output with 88.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 88.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Stanford
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
51.3
Efficiency
88.5
Usage
11.6
Consistency
62.4
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 19. San José State: 53. Duke: 63. Arizona: 20. UCLA: 78. Colorado: 41. Washington State: 128. Washington: 1. USC: 21. Oregon State: 26. Oregon: 56. California: 64. Notre Dame: 97
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 2 by 63.3. San José State: 3 by 100. Duke: 2 by 100. Arizona: 1 by 100. UCLA: 4 by 100. Colorado: 2 by 100. Washington State: 4 by 100. Washington: 1 by 6.7. USC: 1 by 100. Oregon State: 2 by 86.7. Oregon: 4 by 93.3. California: 4 by 100. Notre Dame: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins53.8 · n=11 · +16.3 vs Losses
Losses37.5 · n=2 · -16.3 vs Wins
First Half57.4 · n=7 · +13.3 vs Second Half
Second Half44.2 · n=6 · -13.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Washington State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/3 | @ Oklahoma State | L 38-41 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 11/27 | vs Notre Dame2+ TD | W 28-14 | — | 4 | 97 | 24.3 | 24.30 | 2 | 55 |
| Sun 11/20 | vs California | W 31-28 | — | 4 | 64 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 11/13 | vs Oregon | L 30-53 | — | 4 | 56 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Oregon State | W 38-13 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 14 |
| Sun 10/30 | @ USC | W 56-48 | — | 1 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 10/23 | vs Washington | W 65-21 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Washington State100 receiving yards | W 44-14 | — | 4 | 128 | 32 | 32 | 1 | 62 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Colorado | W 48-7 | — | 2 | 41 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 0 | 37 |
| Sun 10/2 | vs UCLA2+ TD | W 45-19 | — | 4 | 78 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 2 | 51 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ Arizona | W 37-10 | — | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Duke2+ TD | W 44-14 | — | 2 | 63 | 31.5 | 31.50 | 2 | 60 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs San José State | W 57-3 | — | 3 | 53 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 1 | 39 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Stanford
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
2008200920092010201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Stanford | 176 | 80.8 | 14.1 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Stanford | 266 | 70.5 | 16.9 | 90 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Stanford | 266 | 70.5 | 16.9 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Stanford | 434 | 75.8 | 14.3 | 168 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Stanford | 434 | 75.8 | 14.3 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Stanford | 667 | 88.5 | 11.6 | 233 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Stanford | 667 | 88.5 | 11.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Washington
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
57
Primary metric
57 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Virginia Tech
173
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
173 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Notre Dame
56
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
California
75
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Washington State
128
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
128 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Stanford
667 primary output · 88.5 efficiency · 11.6 usage
65.6
#2
2011 Regular Season · Stanford
65.6
667 primary · 88.5 efficiency · 11.6 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Stanford
47.1
434 primary · 75.8 efficiency · 14.3 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.8333
Joliet Catholic Academy · Joliet, IL
- Committed To
- Stanford
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,543
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.