Player Stats

Jalil Carter College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
412
Receptions
30
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2008 Regular SeasonAkron2-00100
2009 Regular SeasonAkron8-00100
2010 Regular SeasonAkron1030412273.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season

Akron paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.

Supporting note

2010 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 73.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2010 Regular Season · Akron

Games

10

Receiving Yards / G

41.2

Efficiency

73.1

Usage

23.8

Consistency

40.5

Best Game by takeover score

Miami (OH)

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Syracuse: 6. Gardner-Webb: 0. Indiana: 34. Northern Illinois: 34. Kent State: 16. Ohio: 25. Western Michigan: 0. Ball State: 69. Miami (OH): 119. Buffalo: 109

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Syracuse: 2 by 20. Indiana: 3 by 75.6. Northern Illinois: 3 by 75.6. Kent State: 2 by 53.3. Ohio: 2 by 83.3. Ball State: 6 by 76.7. Miami (OH): 7 by 100. Buffalo: 5 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins109 · Games = 1 · +75.3 vs Losses
Losses33.7 · Games = 9 · -75.3 vs Wins